Home Blog Page 303

Why I Man-Crush Craig Robinson

58

I thought it was because he could recruit to Corvallis, a town that is "impossible to recruit to", or that upon being hired he objectively noted that the talent he inherited wasn't good enough.

But,  that's only part of it.

The bigger reason is because 90% of athletics is confidence and psychology. Robinson recognizes this better than any OSU coach. Period.

Listen to his weekly press conference: http://www.osubeavers.com/sports/m-baskbl/sched/orst-m-baskbl-sched.html

Highlights:

  • He's getting nitpicky about little things/details
  • Not taking playing well for granted
  • The importance of closing out games/not getting bored. Mentions not boxing out during PSU. Flat out says it wasn't good enough.
  • Admits they're an okay team, wants it to be a great team. Just needs to cut down mistakes to do that.
  • Continue to give max effort and get better even during blowout wins.
  • Tells players "you can't get away with this in the conference" when they perform poorly/sloppy, etc.
  • Doesn't want the conference games to be a "surprise"…so need to treat OOC games as learning experiences where they give max effort and attention to detail.
  • Put together the schedule to go 8-3/build confidence.
  • Etc.

Just watch the interview for yourself. It is highly impressive and shows a guy who understands how to straight shoot (without being a jerk or Mr. Nice Guy), and understands the importance of detail, psychology, etc. So, not only do I love this coach because he recruits great talent to a place fans say is impossible to recruit great talent, but even more so because he "gets it."

Merry Christmas, Beavlettes

127

Angrybeavs will be taking the next week off. In the meantime, this thread can be used for general discussion.

Click the link. It's work-safe, and a Christmas gift for ya'll: Merry Christmas!

Basketball: Oregon State @ Chicago State

56

Jack

I don’t know what to write about this game. To tell the truth, I was disappointed to see it on our schedule. I knew Coach Rob wanted to get back to Chicago this year. But Chicago State? It couldn’t have been Valpo? DePaul? Loyola? Even Notre Dame or Northwestern?

With all the politics of hoops scheduling, I guess it’s what we get.

Maybe next year?

The only thing good about this game is that some prospects in the Chicago area will get to see the Beavs play… and Ahmad will get to go home. I don’t gamble, but I have to imagine there is no line on this game. The Beavs are just expected to win big, and if they don’t they look bad.

Second year head coach Tracy Dildy’s team consists of two returnees, two frosh and eight transfers.

And they’ve been playing like it.

Dildy has been a good recruiter and was an associate head coach for UIC when the Beavs had a foot problem in the closing seconds of a loss there a couple years ago. He has a nice new arena to show off to prospects, and he has a lot of area connections. So he could have CSU on the road to success in the future. But he’s facing more than an uphill battle this year.

Suffice it to say, this should be a blow-out of the 100-50 variety if our boys remain focused and play with a purpose. I don’t know how they do it, but I’m going to assume they don’t have a let down at this point.

Why stop now?

Angry

This game is about one thing: the Beavs fine tuning for conference play. They need to treat Chicago State as if they're Washington. Areas that need improvement before December 29th: boxing out, free throws, rebounding.

Jack brings up a good point regarding Chicago recruits, but that will take care of itself with a good showing. The focus needs to be on refining their game. Want to see the Beavs in a good mental place for that first conference game.

Tipoff is a bit earlier: 5pm.

I don't think there's any TV or streams for tonight's game, so it's either the whining napkin-eater or Game Tracker.

Thoughts on Banker Staying?

112

I think most of us wanted Banker to get the Hawaii job, so my questions are simple:

1. Is anyone happy he's staying?

2. If so, why?

Fans Should Admit When They’re Wrong

89

Over the past two years of writing this blog, I haven't been wrong too often. I'm not saying that to be arrogant or act like a know-it-all jerk. Honestly, anyone can do what I do. It's simply observation followed by writing down said observation.

However, I get things wrong from time to time. Watching hoops last night, it became clear to me I was wrong about Joe Burton. I couldn't stand his game the past two years. Yes, he could pass, but the passes were too hard and resulted in turnovers. Robinson stuck with him. As many of you know, I have had a man-crush on Robinson all along, and even when the team was bad, I was hesitant to criticize him. Mainly because I saw he could recruit, and was trying damn hard to be patient and let those recruits develop. Well, that has panned out nicely so far this year (but Robinson isn't out of the woods yet…let's see how he performs in the conference schedule). Anyway, Robinson stuck with Burton, and now Burton is playing great.

The point?

The point is that I was wrong. Even critical fans should look in the mirror and admit this once and a while. The lesson is not only humility, but in understanding why you were wrong, you become even more astute. For example, I saw Burton's "soft hands" and passing ability all along, but I was wrong to assume he would never learn how to take velocity off the passes and play with less overall anxiety.

Here is a great question: could we be wrong about Riley & Co.?

Well, I know Riley will get the team to 8 wins at some point in the future. I think fans who are overly bearish on Riley right now will be proven wrong. Fans who think he'll get the Beavs to a Rose Bowl will also be proven wrong. Fans who believe Riley will cap out at 8 wins in a year or two will be right. So, it depends on expectations. I think Bob D is right  in that Riley didn't become stupid overnight. The foundations of the current problems began in 2006, precisely the time I was banned from all popular Beaver forums for bringing them up. Now I see a good foundation via improved recruiting, and like the case of Joe Burton, it'll take a year or two of development before they all reach their potential.

The alarming thing here is that Riley couldn't (and still can't) recognize glaring problems himself. For example, he missed the obvious recruiting problems back in 2007, and without immediate defensive tackle help or a change to a 3-4 scheme, he'll be lucky to win four games next year. So, my criticism of Riley today is this: where is the urgency? Identify that you need two D1 defensive tackles. Then find two legitimate D1 defensive tackles…and pronto. There is playing time to sell. This should not be so difficult. I cannot stress how important DTs are to the future of this program. It reminds me of 2007 all over again when I warned about the lack of (a) offensive linemen and (b) defensive backs.

Anyway, don't want to tangent. The point of this article being I hold myself to the same standards as the people I criticize. I think every critical fan should do this. Admit when you're wrong, understand why you were wrong, and bounce back a wiser and fairer evaluator.