Home Blog Page 335

2011 Offensive Line

21

Guys, I am nervous. I don't know what I was hoping to see, but I know it wasn't Remmers, Andrews, Johnson, Ellis, and Phillipp. That much I know.

Defenders are going to be salivating at the A gap (i.e. between center and right guard). Johnson next to Ellis? At least last year the walk-ons were spaced apart with NFL talent Alex Linnenkohl manning the middle.

The proposed line is absolutely ridiculous. And it comes after months of Riley and Cavanaugh's off-season "soul searching". Um, guys, how about doing some recruit searching?

I'm trying to figure out the best group, but it is difficult. I know it involves removing Johnson and Ellis. Beyond that, I am not sure. Geoff Garner has the body of a road grading guard at 307lbs, so why is he listed as a tackle? Grant Enger has the body and agility of a tackle, so why is he listed at guard? Could this simply be an typo? Please tell me it is so.

Offensive line 101: you want road grading guards and quick, agile tackles. Unless of course your team runs a lot of sweeps and traps, then you need quick, agile guards as well. But, is Ryan McCants really going to be running sweeps? Ha. Once again Riley has failed to adjust to his personnel and has instead chosen experience.

So what would comprise the best offensive line?

Good question.

The overall depth is so poor that it's hard to come up with an acceptable configuration. The best I can surmise (and it, too, sucks for different reasons) would be something like Remmers, Garner, Andrews, Phillipp, and Enger. Speaking of whom, Grant was the #3 player in Washington and had offers from Stanford and the Huskies. In other words, he has serious talent and is no dummy. At a quick, agile 279lbs it is mind-boggling that he's been moved to guard. But, such is the byproduct of our coaching staff's off-season soul searching. Think tanks around the world tremble and quake.

The good news is that it is only spring and things can change.

The bad news is that Mike Riley is our head coach, so it will take a hell of a lot for change to actually occur.

Should We Steal Baseball Feeds?

42

Eric Gleske, director of Oregon State baseball games, wrote me an email last night, and he brought up some good points. I'm on the fence. I played devil's advocate with him, but at the same time I understand why he's upset. I'll post the dialogue, and look forward to hearing some opinions on this. His original email is posted first, followed by my response (in the blockquote), and then his final retort.

Angry,

First, let me say that I have thoroughly enjoyed your thoughtful writing about OSU athletics. I agree – there are issues inside of Gill that need to be addressed in many programs; it can be hard some times to be a fan. Your insights and passion combine to create a voice that needs to be heard, by fans, coaches, and administrators. All too often, these groups spend more time hearing each other inside their own echo chamber, which can lead to many often unfortunate results.

That said, I have a bone to pick with. I find it rather duplicitous of you to claim your "Angry" moniker from the position that as a fan you want what's best, or at least better, for OSU, while at the same time actively aiding and abetting those who would take away the ability of other fans to experience, appreciate, and support one of their sports.

I speak of baseball.

I find it ironic, in a manner unflattering to you, that the page on which I found your e-mail address contains the following message: "This site is and will always remain both free and ad free. Donations to help with hosting fees are welcome but never required." You must therefore agree that it takes some level of resources to provide streaming video coverage of the baseball games at OSU, and yet you have, for every home game, provided your readers with a link to see the games for free.

Disgusting.

Full disclosure: I'm the guy who sits in OSU's video truck and directs the coverage. I am not an employee of athletics, but elsewhere on campus, hired in for live game day video production work; and, it should be noted, I write this on my own time, in my own words, and for myself.

I direct a crew of interns and others who work very hard – and in today's game against VMI, in almost dangerous weather conditions for the camera operators – to provide coverage of each home game, coverage that has received good reviews from people who watch it. With limited resources, it's perhaps not the coverage I wish we could do, but we do what we can, as the department does not have enough money to support even incremental improvements I would like to see us bring to our coverage. One thing that has helped is that the positive feedback of folks who have subscribed – OSU fans who understand the value we provide and commit to a subscription for the baseball season; if subscriptions fall, it would into be beyond the realm of possibility that the level of coverage would fall in the future – if not go away completely.

For you to espouse from one side of your keyboard your wish for OSU to be greater while on the other side kicking one of the legs out from under their table is a notion disingenuous at its best, and that notion's best should nevertheless be beneath anyone who professes to be a true OSU fan.

I, for one, would appreciate it if you would quit aiding abetting those who are thieves of OSU's products. Speaking only for myself, my crew works hard for the fans of OSU baseball, and I feel our efforts deserve your respect, not theft.

If you feel you have a compelling argument to promote reduced revenues from the baseball video stream, please — enlighten me. I really, really want to know how your repeated support of content thieves will improve things for Baseball, for Athletics, for OSU.

Finally, let me add that I can't wait for the return of Mike Parker, either.

Yours without anonymity,

Eric Gleske

Directing the baseball stream since 2008=

Personally, I listen to the radio feed because I have an unreliable internet connection.

Maybe your note will hit home with the fans who do use the video and they'll either subscribe or move to radio.

My counterargument would be this: the people who are streaming video very likely don't have the money to pay for a subscription, so if they weren't streaming, they wouldn't be subscribing, either. Also, I haven't looked into the legality of that site. Sometimes if the host is located offshores it's legal to stream. A loophole, but still not illegal. Again, I don't know in this case. A reader actually posted that link in the comment area originally; I didn't go searching for it.

I think a bigger fish to fry would be the person hosting the link, not someone sharing the link. How do OSU fans know if they want to support the baseball team if they can't see it? We pay $60+ a month for cable, many of us add sports packages, and yet we can't get a single game on FSN. And I'm an adult with income. Imagine a student living off loans trying to catch what the new team looks like…bad economy, depressed wages, etc.

I don't run the stream; I just link to it. Last year was the first year in my eight of following OSU athletics that I donated, and I can say a lot of it had to do with finally being able to watch all the teams, including baseball and OOC basketball (via streams). I think you need to realize the people who rely on streams do so because they have to, for financial reasons. 99% of them would move to radio streams before purchasing streams off the official site.

I'd like to post this for discussion though, because maybe I am wrong. Either way, it's a good point.

-Angry

Angry,

Last night I used strong words, and I need to be sure that you are clear on one thing: I am taking you to task for posting the links; I am not suggesting that you are affiliated with the pirates. "Aiding and abetting" was a bit harsh…but it certainly gets your attention. 

From reading your wonderful posts this past year, I think you would appreciate my choice of modus operandi.

No, I don't mind you sharing my thoughts with others. In fact, I truly believe we create a video stream that is worth the money that a subscription costs. It would be nice if it were free, but that's far above my pay grade – I'm not even in that chain of command or decision making. The kids I train work hard, and provide excellent results given the constraints under which we work. It's a far cry from Fenway Park*, where I used to do production with the the best in the business, but we've got a good little system that works to tell the story of each game for those who can't be at Goss. For those with a crappy connection, the stream will look crappy whether it's paid for or not – still, the subscriptions help bring it to the world.  

Although, to be fair, my understanding is that the stream is something of a loss leader, which would make sense, as I can't imagine the subscriber count pays for production costs, as minimal as those are.

Regardless, the individual who is re-streaming the content is in violation of the law. Again, let me be clear: I realize it's not you, you are just providing a link. The pirate streamer is the thief. If they are offshore and hard to get to, it's still theft, and anyone watching the stream from the pirate needs to understand that they are participating in the theft. It is analogous to buying stolen goods from off the back of a truck. If you want to see the stream, go to OSUbeavers.com and sign up. This tells the powers that be that the content is valuable to the fan base, and that resources, in a resource- challenged department, should continue to be allocated for the production of the streaming baseball games.

Again, I speak for myself, and not for athletics. I do know, from being on site in the truck at each game, that the pirate site has been reported and CBS, who is OSU's partner in the streaming side, is looking into shutting it down. That bigger fish is, indeed, being angled for. I do know that in the past there have been issues with the streams as far as quality; basketball, for example. looked rather poor before we stopped streaming when TV coverage kicked in (OSU doesn't stream anything on television, as part of he TV deals). and last year the streaming services were, quite frankly, not working, for the first part of baseball season. But, in large part due to complaints from subscribers, efforts have been made behind the scenes, to improve the IT end of things so that the streams work.  So let's give Athletics a hand and make them work on the other side of the equation. That's only fair, don't you think?

Perhaps my comments are rooted in selfishness: I love baseball – it's the best game – and I love being able to bring it to the world via my skills and give the kids a wonderful opportunity to learn about production as much as learning what makes baseball the best game. I would hate for my opportunity to do this is future seasons to erode because the bean counters decide to give up in the face of piracy. 

Quite frankly, if it were up to me, it would be a more secure stream, but at the same time totally free, so there would be no incentive to go anywhere but OSUBeavers.com to see the content, and they could probably make up the difference with advertising on the website since they would have all the eyeballs going there for free. But it's not up to me, rather, that's a discussion for those inside the athletics marketing brains…

Meanwhile, keep up the good work.

Thanks for listening,

Eric

Interview: Keith McGill

13

My belief is that there's little to learn from interviewing recruits who have signed with Oregon State. The leap in knowledge will come from understanding why our coaching staff has been unable to land the big name prospects who have visited Corvallis. Keith McGill is a perfect example of such a player. McGill, a 4-star safety who narrowed his list to Oregon State and Utah before selecting the latter, was kind enough to shed some light on his recruitment. The transcript follows.

Keith,

First off, thanks for agreeing to share your firsthand, objective perspective with Beaver fans. Sometimes we go crazy wondering why we can't land elite, 4-star talent, so your interview might help answer that question.

From what I remember of your recruitment, playing time and depth chart were serious considerations. Being a Juco, this makes perfect sense. Was the depth chart at Utah more favorable than Oregon State's? Was that the #1 factor in choosing Utah, or were there other reasons?

No, playing time wasn't a factor anywhere. And Utah was more of a gamble if anything. I committed to Utah for family reasons. I was in a bad spot with either school. I was just as ready to be a Beaver just as much as a Ute…

Besides family atmosphere, what did you enjoy most about Oregon State? More specifically, was there anything you loved about the school that the coaches undersold?

I loved the school's history. They didn't understand how much I was willing to put on the line for that. Even though I had a great relationship with the coaches, it seemed to put of they were still trying to sell me on committing when I just wanted to be a part of them.

The Oregon media portrays Riley in a certain way, as a guy who tells recruits to "sleep on it" and never pressures for a signature. As fans, we get frustrated by this because we read every other Pac-10/12 program is out there selling their program aggressively. Did Riley's approach to recruiting come off to you as him not caring? Was the coach's laid back temperament at all a factor in your decision?

Not to me. I loved coach Riley and wish him the best of luck. I called him this season, and we've had several conversions, but I think from point of view from my dad's eyes he was a little laid back compared to other coaches, but that's what I liked about him.

Regarding Corvallis, how much of a factor were weather, co-eds, academic reputation, and the lack of city life? Was there anything OSU could have done to win your signature?

Well I loved the school and mm, maybe, but I don't think so because of the reasons I committed.

You visited on January 14th, which was one of the biggest recruiting weekends in school history. On your visit, did you get the sense that the other high profile recruits (Byron Moore, Todd Peat Jr) were enjoying their trips? Was there a chief complaint among the recruits? (You can be brutally honest–if they didn't like the rain, girls, etc, it would be great to say that so we know).

No I don't think so other than the rain. Lol.

Keith also added this thought in a separate note:

You should know I loved OS and saw very few flaws. Just like Utah it wasn't the coaches that failed. Salt Lake City is just more of a family environment coming from where I lived in California…

Overall, this was a pleasant first interview. Keith seemed honest and gave some good insight. The most interesting bit, in my opinion, is that Riley's demeanor didn't sit well with Keith's father. I imagine this is a common occurrence with "Type-A"/aggressive parents. It's also interesting that McGill loved the school's history. Seems like the coaches were not intuitive enough to pick up on that, and it cost them.

Anyway, I hope to do more of these interviews in the future and have a handful of inquiries out right now. If you guys have specific questions you'd like asked let me know.
 

Baseball: New Mexico State, VMI @ Oregon State

95

The Beavs continue their home stand with four games spanning Friday through Sunday. Game times and probable starters are listed below.

Date Opponent Pitching Matchup Time (PT)
03/11 New Mexico State Sam Gaviglio (2-0, 0.00 ERA) vs. Ryan Beck (2-0, 5.79) 5:35 p.m.
03/12 VMI Ben Wetzler (1-1, 4.40) vs. Jason Farley (0-3, 5.50) 4:30 p.m.
03/13 VMI James Nygren (2-0, 1.72) vs. Sam Roberts (1-1, 4.26) 12:05 p.m.
03/13 New Mexico State Josh Osich (1-0, 3.68) vs. Dan Reid (3-0, 2.84) 4:05 p.m.

VMI stands for Virginia Military Institute. Not going to lie, I had to look that up. The "Keydets", as they are wittily known, play in the Big South Conference, and have posted a 7-6-1 record thus far. From what I could gather, this is their starting lineup:

C Alex Haitsuka Sr. .289 1 5
1B George Piccirilli Jr. .386 1 13
2B Justin Hess Sr. .220 0 0
3B Chase Worthington Jr. .205 1 8
SS Sam Roberts Sr. .440 1 7
LF Graham Sullivan Sr. .296 1 7
CF Rob Dickinson So. .195 0 1
RF Jacob Morley Jr. .275 0 2
DH Andrew Montague So. .143 0 1

They have a 1B and SS who can mash, but the rest of the team appears to be club-swinging cavemen. Much like the Beavers, they lack team pop. However, their team OBP is .400, so Wetzler and Nygren must avoid walks.

New Mexico State, meanwhile, sport an impressive 11-2 record, but their opponents combined mark is 27-46 (.37 winning percentage). They are 1-1 versus winning teams, and their best victory to date was over Cal State Northridge.

Parker Hipp is the Aggies best offensive player. He is hitting .555 with 4hrs and an outrageous .950 slugging percentage. As a team, New Mexico State is batting .372 with a .555 slugging percentage. Again, given the competition, take these (impressive) numbers with a grain of salt.

Sunday's nightcap versus Dan Reid will pose the biggest challenge. Reid, a 6"3 Oklahoman, went 6-3 last season, and is off to a 3-0/2.84 start this year. Like last weekend, expect the Beavers to take all four games, with the series finale being a tight contest that could swing either way.

Radio: KPAM

Stream: Try this

Basketball: Pac-10 Tournament (OSU vs Arizona)

73

Everyone has some egg on their face after this morning's breakfast. Or do we?

Eh. Fans can't be held accountable for knowing which of Sybil's 12 personalities (reference alert: Google is your friend) would show up last night. Beaver fans, and their cynicism of a Stanford blowout, are exonerated.

Personally, I'm more disturbed that I've become so emotional about Craig Robinson. I started out loving the guy for his recruiting prowess, then the love turned to anger after his dubious substitution patterns, and now I'm just up and down with every win or loss. It can't be this way…we need to choose sides. I'm withdrawing into the "needs one year with his own recruits" corner and staying there this time, dammit. Anyone have some shackles? Rope would suffice.

So today the Beavs take on Arizona at 2:30pm. The win versus the Wildcats earlier this season will at least remind the Beavs they can in fact beat this opponent. However, the teams took two distinct, divergent paths after that contest. The Beavers became known, nationally, as a dysfunctional mess–a "Bad News Beavers" of sorts–and their demagogue head coach suddenly found himself on the proverbial hot seat alert. Arizona, meanwhile, gelled and went on to win a conference title.

What will matter is how much growth and confidence can be had from a tournament win versus Stanford. Probably not much considering it was an 8 versus 9 game. I'm reminded of a fight I got into as a kid. I was about 5"8 at the time and knocked out a porky, 5"9 bully. Is that really a big deal? Like a zinc penny, it's worth something, but not a whole lot.

What I expect to see tonight is a fatigued Beav squad. We'll probably see more of the dreaded seniors for that reason, and we'll hate on Craig Robinson for it. I also anticipate Arizona getting every borderline call, while the Beavers sink further into madness and get every borderline…personality disorder? Would you like an order of borderline with your schizophrenia this morning, Mister Robinson?

The great thing about mental illness, so I'm told, is that some days you feel fantastic, many times coupled with delusions of grandeur. Come on mania, rear your beautiful head!

I can't believe this is what I'm left rooting for.

Oh well, Go Beavs?