Home Blog Page 338

Basketball: Oregon State @ Oregon

35

For those of you who want to comment on the game, here is an area for you to do so.

I canceled my cable, so I'll be in my apartment complex's weight room (where they have a TV that gets FSN) pretending to be working out. It's quite the caper, but hey, I basically have a part-time job right now so this is what it's come to. 

After the game, I am going to lower this post and raise the one below it regarding baseball. But, since this game airs first and some people still care about basketball, I have to give them their space.

I have no feel or insight on this game. Gun to my head, I'd say Beavs take this game because they will want to avenge the embarrassment in Corvallis, but the Ducks are playing more solid ball right now. The Beavs cannot beat anyone on the road, never mind a team we all (incorrectly) think they "should" beat, but after reading all the negative press this past week they might come out with an vengeance. An almost impossible game to predict.

When: 1pm

TV: FSN

Radio: KPAM

Can the Beavers Benefit from Duck’s National Surge?

44

To believe that the Beavers could benefit from the Ducks surge to greatness is counter-intuitive, but that does not necessarily mean the idea is false.

First off, let me give you some back story as to why I am even thinking about this notion.

Since the National Title game, I've been reading posts from Beaver fans stating that the line has been drawn in the sand, and moving forward in the Pac-12 OSU will have no chance to compete against Oregon. My first instinct was to agree with them, but before committing that to print something triggered the memory of a summer day in 1992. It is interesting to consider why this memory came to mind, and it is equally interesting that it appeared at all. But that is another story all together. The memory in question is seemingly harmless: my best friend bought a guitar.

You're probably wondering, "what the heck does that have to do with the Beavers or Ducks?"

Touche, touche.

But, you see, I had a guitar first, before my best friend. It lay in the corner of my room for two years, but I didn't practice a lick until my friend bought a $100 Fender knock off and began to play it fairly well. Then, suddenly, I felt the pressure of time; the anxiety of being left behind; the humility of being worse than a peer. These forces combined to make me practice diligently, and within months I was the better player.

Maybe now you can see where I am going with this anecdote? The Ducks surge could be beneficial for similar reasons.

The Pink Floyd song "Time" sums up the anxiety and pressure of frittering opportunity with one profound verse:

And you run, and you run to catch up with the sun, but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death

Beaver players surely feel the dread of their numbered days. The natural tendency, as in my guitar analogy above, is to fight twice as hard so neither time nor peers pass you by. I argue we may see this happen, as it is human nature, and human nature has a way of rearing itself.

Further, Oregon State can use the Ducks national cache to their advantage in the following ways:

1. Market Oregon as the new California. In other words, the "hip" state to play in. The Ducks are doing this as we speak, and if the Beavers are wise they will follow the lead and ride their coattails. Before T. Boone Pickens made Oklahoma State relevant, they used this tactic on Oklahoma.

2. Speaking of riding coattails, if the talking heads are gloating about Oregon, they're one slip of the tongue away from mentioning Oregon State. It's hard to talk about one without mentioning the other. Beaver recruiters and media should use the fact that the national spotlight is focusing on the State as a whole. How do they do this? Well, every recruit knows about Oregon's high power running attack. OSU's staff should be able to land top defenders who want the challenge and opportunity of stopping said offense on a national stage in the Civil War. That challenge is a selling point.

3. Phil Knight knows the Civil War rivalry is good for the state of Oregon and his university. If Oregon gets too far ahead, the game not only loses meaning, but Oregon's body of work would weaken. Knight is an Oregonian first and foremost. For this reason, expect him to help OSU in some way if things get ugly.

In closing, the Ducks rise could spell the downfall of the Beavers as many have predicted. But it could–via the dread and anxiety of passing opportunity–force the Beavers to rise to the occasion or perhaps even above it. If creative, Oregon State could theoretically use the Duck's 15 minutes of fame to recruit an all-world defense.

Will they do so? History says no. The Beavers are not outside the box thinkers nor are they salesmen. To use my guitar analogy above, they'd simply let the instrument lie in the corner collecting dust. Opportunity knocks once again, but is anyone in Corvallis listening?

Regarding Paul Buker’s Reference

63

As you guys know, we were referenced in Buker's article this morning. You can read it here.

First off, I had no idea the article existed until a reader told me. Secondly, I dislike meta-blogging (i.e. blogging about this blog) because it strays from the agenda, but I've been forced to do it yet again because of misconceptions that need clearing up. Forgive me.

Moving on, I found two reader comments particularly frustrating/ignorant.

The first is by Beaver13. He writes:

I have another reason to dislike you Buker, you gave the idiots at angrybeaver some ink. Don't encourage those guys.

Verbatim, including what I will assume are just typos and grammatical laziness. Anyway, I've heard this sentiment a lot. The guys at Rivals, many of whom post at pure-orange.net as well, have a pact to never mention this blog. They believe that ignoring, censoring, and banning dissenting opinion will make the site go away. That I'm only doing this for attention and self-promotion. They believe this because I link the blog on other websites in an effort to promote it.

Okay, let me address this once and for all because it is highly frustrating. It is true; I do post the link on other sites, and in the past couple months I have tried to promote it more. I have reasons for doing so, which I've stated numerous times since starting the site in June of 2009. How about my "critics" ask "why?" instead of jumping to conclusions? I'm easily accessible (see contact button) to answer that question if anyone desires to ask it, and I can take the criticism and address it just like like I dish it out. What gets old is people making assumptions and implying the blog is about ego, some latent desire to be a journalist, fame, or money. I don't care about any of those things (on second thought, money never hurt). But if that was a goal I'd be accepting ads I've been offered. Enough said.

The second frustrating comment was authored by billybeav. He writes:

I think the angry beavs site is retarded as well….. Of course a duck would enjoy it, it is nothing but beaver bashing.

Again, I see this sentiment a lot. Does anyone who actually reads the blog truly believe it's just some bitter asshole blindly bashing the Beavers? There's reason and justification behind all the criticism. Pure Beaver bashing would be writing something like "James Rodgers is a terrible receiver!" if he drops one pass…and then finding ways to justify or exaggerate such a blatant lie. That would be ridiculous. But saying "Keith Pankey should not be near a football field" is the truth; a truth that bothers ardent fans like myself who want to see their team win games.

The guys who wrote those comments, sadly, probably won't read this post and respond to it intelligently. But, I encourage them to inquire about the purpose instead of jumping to conclusions. Is the blog perfect? No. My biggest flaw is that I have about a dozen other hobbies, and therefore I sometimes get lazy with my research. I also never edit my posts for grammar, etc. These would be valid criticisms. But the overall sentiment of this blog is spot-on accurate, and I will never apologize for the agenda, but I will gladly explain it to those who inquire instead of assume.

Discussion: Baseball

38

Enough with the basketball and football failures. It's time for us to fail in another sport: baseball. With Cliff's writeup coming out in the Times tomorrow, I figured this would be a good time to discuss opening day.

The official site has an informative writeup on the infield and outfield:

Sounds like we're going to be a team that scrapes for runs. Maybe even more so than last year. Susac might be the best power threat. Nash is surprisingly going to start out in CF. I don't like the idea of Miller as a starting OF. He was terrible on offense last year; he couldn't even get bunts down. Maybe Poyer grabs that spot?

Without too much thought behind this, I like an infield of:

3B-Not sure. Maybe Jake Rodriguez? Great HS numbers, but zero experience, and he didn't exactly tear up the West Coast League.
SS-Carter Bell
2B-Tyler Smith (He really  needs to improve his offense to be an every day 2B)
1B-Dylan Jones/Parker Berberet
C-Andrew Susac/Parker Berberet

And an outfield of:

RF-Jared Norris
CF-Garret Nash
LF-Jordan Poyer? Probably a reach, but he seems like the best speed/power threat out of the group. More likely is Norris starting in LF and Miller starting in RF. Ugh.

Sounds like a lot of these guys are interchangeable. I'm starting to see why we're picked 8th in the Pac-10…not a whole lot of pop in this lineup. The pitching staff should be good to great, though. I'm really high on Boyd, and he's rightfully starting out in the rotation. The bullpen appears shaky, but there's going to be addition by subtraction with the graduation of "KRhod".

This team has the feel of a turn of the century dead-ball-era squad: an abundance of pitching, limited power, good speed, and good defense. While I love that era and style of baseball, I'm not sure it works well with the *ping* bats. Stefan Romero leaving early was a shock at the time, and it's tempered my enthusiasm for this year's squad. If an unknown quantity, such as Poyer or Rodriguez, can provide offensive pop then the team could do well.

Basketball: Oregon State @ UCLA

35

Today is the Lady Beav's birthday, so I am taking her out to lunch and then wine tasting. I'm not sure I'll be home for the game, but either way, I don't have time to write much about it this morning.

All I'd say is I'm expecting a loss for the same reasons I outlined last week:

1. The Beavers only play well versus Goliath teams where they have no pressure and nothing to lose.

2. The Beavers only play well at home versus such teams where the crowd forces them to focus.

With UCLA on a roll of late, they meet one of two criteria, which means a Beaver loss. This stat from the official site backs me up:

The Beavers are scoring about the same no matter where they play this season, averaging 71.4 points at home and 66.4 points on the road per game. The big difference is the scoring of their opponents, which are averaging 65.9 points at Gill Coliseum and 80.0 points per game on their respective home courts.

How do you explain allowing 15 more points on the road other than a complete lack of focus?

Nelson and Smith are going to have their way inside. Honeycutt will make them pay for playing a zone. I expect a romp, and the Beavers losing streak to UCLA to uptick to 13 straight.  The only things certain in life are death, taxes, and the Joe Burton costing the Beavers another game.

79-59, Bruins.

When: 1pm

TV: FSN (Nationally)

Radio: KPAM