Home Blog Page 375

Ryan Allen Transfers

By
angry
-
45

You might ask: what’s the big deal about a backup punter transferring, Angry?

Well, I will tell you.

I saw Allen punt in person a handful of times, and he was light-years better than Johnny Hekker. We’re talking punts that went above the stadium, ala an NFL leg. His only downside was consistency.

It begs the question: why would Riley spend so much time developing an equally inconsistent punter with a worse leg in Johnny Hekker? Anyone who watched pregame kicking could see Allen was the man.

I’ll be curious to follow Allen’s career at Louisiana Tech. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t make the NFL, where as Johnny Hekker has no shot. To me this is as egotistical as Mike Riley gets. He wants to have a “great story” and “uncover a gem”…a high school QB turned punter. If Riley can get him to be all-conference by senior year it will continue his reputation as a talent evaluator. The problem with that logic is that any coach could turn an average athlete into an all-conference punter if given four years. Most don’t do it because it’s a large investment with little payoff. Hekker was a liability last year. Do not mention the Sun Bowl or any false positive statistics–he was a liability and has been a liability since he joined the team. Riley has not once used the one interesting facet of Hekker: his ability to throw on a fake punt.

The bottom line is that Ryan Allen was the man for this job and because of egotistical stubbornness Mike Riley let him walk. Another questionable decision. These are really beginning to add up. Little roster tweaks like this are a big deal. Riley puts practically zero emphasis on special teams and other than lucking into Alexis Serna it’s come back to bite him (e.g. Civil War, Stanford 2008, etc). The program is worse off today.

In other news, Moevao was denied an additional year. I don’t think any of us can make a good argument against that decision and it’s what we all expected. Personally, I’m glad to see the reigns handed over to a player with more upside.

Huskies @ Beavs

By
angry
-
13

I have no confidence in the Beavers winning this type of game. That is, a game that matters; a game that takes the respective sport to the next level.

On Friday we watched the baseball team lose this exact type of game. Yes, the baseball team was once elite, but start accepting that the CWS teams were five years ago now.

The past two Decembers we saw the football team lose this exact type of game, twice.

Now I’m supposed to believe the basketball team is ready to win a game that takes the program over the hump? No. The Beavs always fail in these “take the next step” type of games. Never mind a sporadic solid performance; until the Beavers consistently perform when the pressure is truly on I’ll continue to bet against them. There’s no reason they can’t or shouldn’t win this game, but because of all the psychological issues that come with attending Oregon State and playing athletics for Oregon State, they won’t.

71-59, Dawgs

Washington State @ Gill & The Coca-Cola Classic

By
angry
-
11

Basketball| I expect the Beavers to win this game for two reasons:

1.  The Beavs have done a great job of neutralizing the best player on the court (this player is always on the opposition; the Beavers never have the best player). It’s a smart tactic that they do well, and this bodes poorly for Klay Thompson.

2. The chance to finish .500. With a win tonight the Beavs will be playing Saturday for a chance to qualify for the NIT and finish even on the year.

As you can see, the Beavers have both the motivation and strategy needed to win this game, and those two things win college basketball games. The only way they lose this game is if they go outside the moment and look ahead to Saturday. The home crowd should help them maintain focus. Beavs by 6. Also, how is this game not on television? Washington State and Oregon State need to figure out a way to get their matchups on TV. Got snubbed in football, now this. It’s 2010, guys.

Baseball| The Beavs, currently ranked #10 in the nation, begin the Coca Cola Classic versus UC Riverside.  In that game they hold a 10-3 advantage right now, but Kevin Rhoderick is in the game, so hold your breath. The opening game is an appetizer, with the main course served tomorrow versus #2 Arizona State. After that, a dud of a team in Utah State and then the ever-feisty Cal Poly. OSU should take 3 games in this tournament. Anything less is a disappointment. My feeling is that, while the Beavers have nice pitching, it’s still not elite. Arizona State will rack up somewhere in the 7 run area versus these guys and tantalize Beav hitters enough to come out with a win. Think something like 7-3, Sun Devils.

Note: It’s interesting that Pat Casey put KRhod in this game with a huge lead; he’ll be forced to use a different closer tomorrow in what he clearly views as a more important game. Smart move, and don’t think for a second it’s not calculated. Rhoderick, as is his wont, dominated the no-pressure-7-run-lead situation and padded his stats. This makes it difficult when apologists like myself want to wax criticism–we have to contend with his great numbers. I don’t like this player, as you can probably see, so I’ll be following the guy closely and exposing him for the fraud that he is.

OSU @ Galen and Tennesse @ Goss

By
angry
-
48

First of all, the basketball team…Jack, a key point you missed is the importance of this game in the overall progress of the program. I think a realistic goal for this season is the NIT. Technically a team doesn’t need a .500 record to qualify, but no sub .500 team has ever qualified since the rule change, so for all intents and purposes the Beavers need to win out.

That means tonight’s game is enormous. In the national picture it’s a blip on the radar, but for this program and the progress they are trying to make, it’s a stepping stone for both next season and respectability. Huge.

We know how poorly the football team performs in these “take the next step” type of games. How will the basketball team fair? I’m not sure. We’re two years into his “presidency”, and I still don’t know enough about Craig Robinson to say if he’ll have the team focused for this type of game. From what I’ve seen, I think he will, but the fact that the game is at the Galen Center makes me nervous. The Trojans, despite having nothing to play for (i.e. for those unaware, the Trojans inflicted self-imposed sanctions and will be barred from post-season play), will not be pushovers. What fascinates me about USC, and makes me respect them greatly, is how hard they have played when they could have packed it in months ago. It’s remarkable, really. They have a better conference record than the Beavers, a 16-11 overall record, and have knocked off some tough teams (e.g. Cal, UCLA) in the past few weeks while annihilating Washington by 25 just over a month ago. Like most teams, the Trojans perform better at home, and the Beavs have been poor on the road. This bodes poorly for the Beavs. And don’t assume the Trojans are just showing up because the game is on their schedule–they want to play tonight, they want to win, and this particular writer thinks they will.

As far as the baseball team, I just want to say that that was an impressive dismantling of Tennessee yesterday. 17-1. Wow. I’ve been watching baseball (mostly MLB) for over 20 years, and one thing I’ve concluded, mostly through empirical observation, is that it’s a sport of averages. It seems like every time I see team x dismantle team y, team x scores no runs the next day. Look for the Beavers to drop this game and score little in the process. Something like 5-1, Vols.

And speaking of the baseball team, what is the deal with Kevin Rhoderick? This is yet another 20 year old machismo knucklehead who thinks he can overpower hitters with his straight as the Marlboro Man fastball. How many guys have to fail with this approach before they have an epiphany, or before coaches teach them the art of movement, location, and change of speeds? Does anyone feel confident with “KRhod” closing games? This guy is the Armando Benitez of college closers.

Bob De Carolis Responds

By
angry
-
13

Bob De Carolis responds to my concern over a $40 minimum donation:

Angry, sorry for the tardy response. Was out of town and delegated this to staff but we dropped the ball, our bad.  Here is what I found out.

While the online process is very convenient for the donor it comes with a significant price per transaction to the athletic department because it is contracted out to a third party. So at some level below $40 we would actually lose money, therefore the minimum. To correct this in the short term we will be adding some type of info on the site for those that choose to donate below the minimum to either send a check directly to BASF or better yet call us toll free with credit card handy and we can process the donation internally over the phone. That piece should be up by next week some time. Long term we will be searching for a new less expensive third party. Hope this all helps. Thanks for bringing this to our attention and thanks for your support of the Beavers. If you have any additional questions let me know.

Bob De Carolis

Director of Athletics

Oregon State University

541-737-7373

Go Beavs!

Fair enough, Bob, but it makes me wonder why donations are being processed through a third party when there is so much cheap labor available on campus, and why the third party is so expensive (i.e. is there a bidding process, accountability, etc?), and why there isn’t information about small donations via check or credit card on the site.

Also, “thanks for your support of the Beavers” cracked me up, and it would crack you up as well, if you saw what I wrote in the body of my email. Though, I might actually send a few bucks now that I have received an explanation.

In the end, I am happy with Bob’s response, especially the fact that he is now aware of the problem and seems ready and willing to improve it. I’m just disappointed that the leadership didn’t see the flaws in this system on their own.

1...374375376...395Page 375 of 395