Brennan Olander: Two Viewpoints
This is simply a copy/paste job from the comment area of the main thread on Olander, but it so poignantly showcases the viewpoint of Beaver fans and the conflict it’s creating within myself that I thought it would make for good discussion.
Mckalk, a reader whom I respect based on his past insights, had this viewpoint, which having perused the blogs and forums, seems to summarize the majority opinion:
I am ok with James…one game suspension. Somewhat unclear circmunstances, right? Domestic dispute gone out of control? Masoli was kind of premeditated theft. Went into someone’s house and stole a couple of thousand dollars worth of stuff, that is a true felony. Then he lied to his head coach if I understand it correctly. I can see why he got suspended for a season. I don’t know what Riley has said to Olander in the past…maybe it is a three strike situation. I am just saying ( and I could have my head up my) that if you look at the misdemeanor he committed, it is not a career ender in my book. I am disturbed that Riley seems to have his head buried in the sand with all of this going on and really in hindsight there should have been more debate about the Al Alfalava situation…drunk driving is a serious offense. Third wheel on a golfcart joyride..not so much.
My response is as follows:
It’s not a career ender in my book, either, but when you add it to the body of work it should be.
My argument is one of a slippery slope, I realize. To say that because he did x in the past he will do z in the future. But there’s a point where the “slope” dries up a little, a pattern emerges, and you can begin to confidently predict based on that pattern. For me two of these events would be enough, but to someone more lenient I’d hope four is plenty.
My question would be this: how many more “minor” offenses are acceptable to you?
The main issue for me and Beaver fan is the incongruity in their rationalization:
1. Beaver fans who wanted James’ head for a misdemeanor are much more forgiving of Olander.
They act as if the behavior is perfectly normal for college kids, when in fact I’ve never seen a college kid in my entire life driving a golf cart around while drunk and likely neither have they. Further, they completely ignore the danger it could have caused to citizens or (potential) innocent victims. For example, what if they drove this golf cart into the road and caused a vehicular manslaughter? It’s for these very reasons the severity of the law exists.
2. Beaver fans are justifying and rationalizing Oldander’s behavior because it’s a position (DT) of need.
If this were a 6th string safety there would be little justification or care. Think back to Ashton Jefferson or Reggie Jefferson, how minor their FIRST infraction was, and how little anybody cared when they were booted. Further, Riley becomes inconsistent and preferential–the two things with which Beaver fan loaded his quiver while riding his high horse in the Eugene disciplines–if he lets Olander remain on the team.
Consider this quote from Cliff Kirkpatrick after the Jefferson/Williams incident:
“Riley has a near zero tolerance policy for alcohol/drugs. That could have done it. Near-zero because if someone has a long history of being good, he takes that into consideration. (Al Afalava)”
Oldander was drunk, illegally using a vehicle, had a past marijuana charge, and two thefts.
Just think about this for a while before responding.
Which of these viewpoints most reflects what you think, and more importantly, why?