Home Athletics More on Keith Heyward

More on Keith Heyward

26

I'm still waiting to hear the official reason for his departure. Last night I thought it was money, but Heyward didn't really get a raise when cost of living is factored in. In fact, he got less, even after factoring the lack of State income tax. So, here are some other reasons he may have left:

  • Washington is a better, more historical program. Easier to get recognized there.
  • Big city life.
  • On a staff where everyone recruits/he isn't the lowest paid coach in the conference doing the most recruiting. AKA recognition for results. This one is squarely on Riley–he's paying Brennan and Brasfield 15k more than Heyward.
  • No chance of promotion on the OSU staff unless someone dies or retires.
  • I hear his fiancee lives in Seattle. But, she also likes Oregon, so I am not sure that was the issue.

Cursory glance and initial reaction is that this looks very bad for Riley and OSU, both in terms of their cluelessness but also what could be brewing on the inside. A lot of recruits have been waffling and looking for something better. Something just doesn't feel right.

I think this comment by FedUpBeav summed things up nicely:

Seems like our most dynamic people like Stansbury and Heyward are being pushed out or deciding to leave because their voices will be more appreciated at many other institutions where the stale and old doesn't rule the roost like at OSU.  Don't like our priorities at all of overly rewarding the dinosaurs that don't feel they have to do anything different and stifling the Young Lions with the most energy.

The only counter-argument I'd make is that the two young, new guys are making more than Heyward (maybe this is simply an inflation adjusted hiring rate vs a cost of living pay increase), but otherwise the statement rings true.

As far as a replacement, haven't heard any names, but knowing Riley and his ignorance of recruiting, he'll likely promote Mitch Meeuwsen. This would be the nail in the coffin. What OSU needs is to hire someone with LA ties who can keep intact the best class in over a decade.

To me this looks like Heyward said, "I'm doing all the recruiting and not getting any of the reward. Guys doing less are getting more". He spoke with his leverage. Sort of like how I said fans should do the same with their wallets.

Something doesn't feel right, folks.

26 COMMENTS

  1. I love Mitch, and I think he’ll succeed as a coach one day if that’s what he does. But this isn’t the right place for him to start.

    I’ve already said I like Tony White (SDSU) best for all the tangible and intangible reasons available. But we would have to invest some money to hire anyone away from SDSU since they pay their OC $275K and their other 8 coaches $150K apiece.

    • I have no problem with Mitch staying on as a GA or some minor position, but in terms of him being the right guy right now, he’s just not. Agree completely on all points.

      Speaking of SDSU, they got Ryan Katz, Dillon Baxter, and Brice Butler…pretty impressive transfer list.

      • White almost pulled Aaron Porter away from UCLA, and he still has Shelton interested in SDSU.

        Something you might not like:
        White heavily recruited Joel Skotte before Joel cut his list to us and Boise.

  2. From the department of thickest NCAA football observer of all time:

    “There is some message board hand-wringing going on about Heyward’s departure so late in the recruiting season, but it seems far-fetched to think a potential recruit will jump ship because the DBs coach is leaving the program.”

    — Paul Buker

    • Ummm… I know he was a GA here, and he was a good player. But after one year coaching DB’s at the FCS level… in Pocatello… for a really bad team… on the FCS level?

      I’d rather take the last year of GA away from Mitch and give it to him.

      Drayton would be very short-sighted for an OSU hire.

    • It’s all about personality and connections. I have no idea if Drayton has an outgoing/likeable personality. Doubt he has connections at this stage. He grew up in the LA area, so that’s a plus…

  3. Salary is more than buying power. It’s a tangible measure of respect that says your work is valued. It’s probably less about “money”, and much more about being the lowest paid staffer despite success. That sucks.

    And regardless what the reason was, I doubt this move wouldn’t have preventable, if OSU had come back with say $150K. If it wasn’t about money, OSU could afford to make it about money. At least, they could if they’d pull their heads out of the sand, notice the pac 12 media money rushing on, and stop yelling “we’re so poor!” long enough.

  4. Is Banker really that clueless, anybody who has been in the recruiting game on either side should know it could have an effect. The person that got you excited about the program jets, for another school in the same conference? Come on.. that would make me think twice. This just sucks, why do we have low paid assistants? We are in the PAC-12, we must be able to pay more than say SDSU. That is ridiculous. Ugh!

  5. How do we know he didn’t get a raise? The only thing I read with regard to salary was that UW’s lowest paid assitant made $124K last season (and yes, I agree that Seattle $124K < Corvallis $105K). Who's to say he signed a contract to make what last year's lowest paid assistant made?

  6. More names to consider. There’s no news to these names just ones I figure would be good choices.
    Ron zook. Excellent recruiter and is a defensive coach.
    Richard siegler. Dline coach at psu(who knew?).
    Rocky seto. Former USC coach.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here