Home Blog Page 322

Oregon State @ Utah (Pre-Game)

91

Would you rather have the better quarterback or better coach?

I think the answer is clearly the better QB. Just look around the NFL. Heck, look at the Colts. Sean Mannion is becoming a strength. Not against great teams just yet, but he's a difference maker in these games of equal talent.

A few weeks ago, before the BYU game, I wrote that the Beavers would lose that game because they had a "one step forward, two back" feel to them. Well, now it feels like they're catching on and gelling, and this is where they take two steps forward and one back (i.e. next week vs Stanford).

Kyle Wittingham is a great coach…better than Riley. He'll have Utah ready to go, he'll know how and where to outflank the Beavs, but Mannion's savvy and talent overcome that.

My biggest concern this game is Mike Remmers. He is just brutal. The game should be close, so his boneheaded play could negate some big run/pass plays and marginalize the Beavers' vastly superior offense. Still, at the end of the day, I can't be betting against the left tackle being the difference maker. That is too random. The better QB wins this game.

Beavers 27-24

Post WSU General Discussion

216

Sorry, guys. I've been extremely busy with personal stuff, and not much time to blog or follow the Beavs right now.

Anyway, the last comment area had 400 posts, so it's time for a new post. Use this for anything you'd like. Hopefully in the next couple days I'll have more time to write down some concrete thoughts and reason through them.

Off the top of my head:

  • Utah gives the Beavs a great opportunity to take two steps forward. Want to at least go into the Stanford game feeling good.
  • The Beavs can still, technically, win the North (ha ha) and make a bowl game (ha ha).
  • Stanford and Oregon are most likely the fans bowl games this year.
  • The defensive ends contained Tuel…that was nice to see. They played with passion.
  • Anthony Watkins needs to be called out. The guy is a terrible safety.  I'd like to see more Murphy. Reynolds has also been poor, but he has potential and made a nice INT.
  • I'm tired of the PI rules…watching the NCAA and NFL this past weekend, a DB can't breath on a WR. On that same note but slightly off topic, what is with the NFL kickoffs? That rule has destroyed the most exciting play in the game and turned pro ball into the Arena League.
  • Sean Mannion has "it"…I think "it" is poise, or courage under pressure. He'd make a great Ernest Hemingway character ala Robert Jordan. The literary folks out there might get the reference.
  • I haven't read any post game notes or listened to Riley's interviews, so I can't praise or criticize. I do know that the play calling was fantastic, and since I criticize when it is horrible, it would be unfair not to acknowledge that. Did the media ever ask if Riley was involved in play calling? That did not have the hallmarks of a Langsdork game…I think he received an assist.

Have at it. I'll try to scout Utah and get something written up, but like I noted above, life has gotten in the way of football for now.

Oregon State @ Washington State (Game Thread)

379

This is the comment area for the Washington State game.

I know I picked against the Beavs in this game, and I am sticking with that, but I should have added one note: if the Beaver's defensive ends can collapse the pocket and sack Tuel before he scrambles, I think the Beavs could win the game. To me the Beav's DEs are the key to this game. This is exponentially true since Robinson is getting the LB start. Watch the DEs. You'll know by the first quarter if they're getting Tuel or not, and hence if they'll win or not. Mannion should put up nice numbers on this secondary.

This game is huge. Need to keep the current recruits and stay out of the cellar. A win tonight could parlay into some success in the Utah/Cal games. We'll see.

Expect to watch three hours of agonizing football tonight, folks.

Go Beavs.

Addressing Pettibonehead & “Troll” Policy

56

While Santa is away, the elves come out and play.

Wow.

Did not expect to wake up to all this anti-Petibonehead talk this morning. Anti-Angry talk I am used to, but not this.

So I thought about the complaints this morning, and the sentiment bothers me. People are saying, "I donated to this site, and I dislike Pettibonehead, so you should ban him."

This is one of the reasons I fear taking donations, advertising dollars, or linking blog rolls. It makes readers believe they have a say in how the site should be run. Almost like a board of directors or shareholders in a corporation. That is low to make threats like that. You donated to the site because you see it's hard work, good information, and you want to see it continue. Don't stoop to threats like that.

When the site opened in 2009, there was a pest named Humongous Organ who showed telling me he banged my mother behind a Flying J, but nobody came to my defense then. Nobody asked for him to be banned. I came back with some good quips, ignored his subsequent responses, and the troll eventually left. That's how you handle a troll. You make a comeback that cuts to the bone and makes him fear your next response will cut through the bone, and then you ignore all subsequent responses. Trolls feed off attention.

Now, if we had a troll who was a real issue…say…giving out JackBeav's personal information, address, etc, then he would be banned immediately. Pettibonehead shows up once every three or four days, and he makes funny quips and actually provides history and insight to people who didn't live through the Pettibone era. I'm not even sure I view him as a troll…I view him as a quirky, funny, historian. So, there is a snowball's chance in hell I ban him. I actually hope he posts more and shares more history. Hell, give me a Kragthorpe "troll", too.

If my not banning the troll causes you to stop reading the site, so be it. You'll lose out on unique insight and commentary. I view it as a you problem, not a site problem. Stop with the threats and just leave if that's how you feel. I manage this site fairly, and we basically have zero trolls because they respect the analytical, intellectual tone and management of the site. There are hundreds of Duck fans who read this site, and instead of trolling it, they respect it. Can you say that about any other (public) Oregon State website that doesn't have a single moderator? I doubt it.

If WordPress ever develops a plugin that allows readers to ban other readers, I'll install it and you can individually block anyone you want. In the meantime, no censorship unless it's harmful to a reader's personal well-being or privacy. The only exception is voluminous and pointless links/spam/blathering (e.g. Beaver Byte teeters that line…I actually wanted to ban him, yet you guys voted "no"). Anyway, that's the policy. If Pettibonehead starts posting every hour and really detracting then I'll ban him, but right now he doesn't do that.

I'd recommend learning to laugh or ignore. Both are wonderful skills.

-Angry

Oregon State @ Washington State (Pre-game)

241

On Saturday night, buried within the obscure, lo-fi Fox derivative channels, the Oregon State/Washington State game will air. People flipping through might mistake it for a high school game. This is small time football, folks. Nobody seems too upset. Everyone has an excuse. Okay, whatever, the game must be played, unfortunately.

When scouting Washington State last week, I noticed a couple things:

  • Their QB, Jeff Tuel, is mobile. Not Nelson Riley or Darron Thomas mobile, but more like Jake Plummer. A savvy guy who moves around and breaks the pocket when necessary. Obviously this is bad news for the Beavers, as once again they will be at an 11 vs 12 disadvantage. Tuel isn't a bad passer, either.
  • Washington State runs some read option. Uh oh. Mark Banker will be exposed (again).
  • The Cougars play with passion. The crowd didn't seem especially large, but they were into last week's game, and the Cougars played Stanford with fire and passion for all four quarters (even when they fell behind by 17).
  • Their WR, Marquees Wilson, is a beast. I'm not confident Poyer can cover him.
  • They play with confidence. Amazing to write this given their track record the past few years, but it's a fact, this team has confidence, and they've come together nicely. Credit to Wulff for changing the culture.

On paper this game is an even match–both teams recruit the same type of player and both teams are young. However, Washington State plays with attitude and confidence. Taking from my last post about chess, Mike Riley and Paul Wulff are just about equal as "candidate masters", but Wulff has engrained a Sisyphean mentality in his players. They lose, they get up, they do it again. No skin off their back. In fact, they get better and tougher with each loss. It's something I'd love to say about the Beavers, but I don't print lies.

This is a very close game, and one I am reluctant to pick. Gun to my head, I feel Washington State is a more "put together" team right now who play like they have a unified goal. That psychology does wonders when going up against a physically equal opponent who is in a mentally lesser place. It wouldn't surprise me to see this game go into overtime, but I respect the Cougs enough to give them the standard 3 point home field advantage and then some.

29-24, Cougars