Home Blog Page 340

Basketball Post Game

63

1. Joe Burton's new nickname is "The Keith Pankey of college basketball"

2. Joe Burton and Calvin Haynes shall, from this point forward, be dubbed "The Blues Brothers" due to the fact that every time both are in the game sad things happen.

3. Craig Robinson learned nothing versus Washington. I gave him too much credit. That game was coincidence and luck.

4. I can't believe I wasted an hour today analyzing and writing about this team. Shame on me!

5. Beavers cannot find the enthusiasm and focus needed to beat middle of the road teams.

6. The crowd was ready to erupt and believe in this team if they could just win back to back games, but instead they were silenced once again. How long before they stop attending?

7. Has a woman's head coach ever become the men's head coach in NCAA history? I've asked this three times now with no response. Anyone??

8. Big time souring of Craig Robinson by Angry (mainly for playing Haynes and Burton).

9. Joe Burton is going to kill someone with a pass before his career is over. Maybe I should dub him Joe "The Scalper" Burton.

10. Kill us all.

Oh, one more thing: have I mentioned how much I hate Haynes and Burton? Here's to both getting hit by a bus.

I'm ghost.

-Angry

Basketball: Washington State @ Oregon State

33

There's a lot to ponder after the Beavs defeated Washington by 12 points Thursday night. How does that happen when the same roster lost by 30 in Seattle? There are hundreds of viable theories. Below are two of them that seem like patterns to this angry beaver's eyes.

1. The home crowd's energy dictates the Beaver's focus. This is a decent observation since the bad OCC loses had small, dead crowds and in those games the Beavs lost focus. Additionally, the team has just one win on the road–a game at Howard where Obama's presence demanded their attention.

2. Beavers play with great energy (@home) versus Goliath teams, against whom they have nothing to lose. In such situations, they've beaten the two best teams in the league, Arizona and Washington, and took the third best team, UCLA, down to the wire. Conversely, they have come out flat versus inferior or equal opponents.

The Beavs goal is short-sighted and immediate versus superior teams: slay Goliath and shock the world. But against middle of the pack teams, the purpose becomes blurred and the vision long-term. Put another way, beating average teams and winning the Pac-10 requires more day to day focus than taking down one giant. I'm not sure why they lack the confidence set high goals. People will want to blame Robinson, but should he lie and set false goals? When he's confident in his roster, he will probably list winning the Pac-10 as a goal. The roster is good, but it's not yet at the point where Craig should go all Rex Ryan on the league.

Then there are the players. They must wonder, "big picture: what are we playing for when we face…Stanford or Texas Pan-Am?" People will blame Robinson for their aimlessness, but step outside yourself and imagine being one of these players. Now try to imagine what your goal as a team would or should be. Having a clear vision must be especially difficult on a team comprised of unproven players. These recruits are not McDonald's All-Americans who have been told they are the Lord incarnated since birth. They play at Oregon State, an outpost of college basketball. It's easy to understand why a freshman or sophomore would fear "stepping up" as leaders and offending a group of seniors who all lack said leadership. Starks may assume that role. His attitude, backed up by his play, show promise and carried the Beavers to a victory Thursday night.

Back to Robinson for a moment. People want to blame the man because everything starts and stops at the top, or so we're told. Well, to me it looks like Craig's plan was to be patient the first half of the year, let the seniors have their time, and only name names once absolutely necessary. For fans this was painful because we saw flashes of greatness, and it always came from the youth. I kept thinking, "Robinson is not dumb, he must have a reason." Well, we saw him call out the seniors finally, and then play the fiery Starks for an extended minutes. Do you believe the timing–the halfway point of the season–was coincidence? It seems calculated.

Tonight should be telling. Was Thursday's upset dumb luck? Did Washington just lay an egg? Is Robinson's patience with the seniors truly shot? Has coach seen the light and learned his best rotation, or did he know it all along and held back for reasons only known to him. We'll see in a few hours.

If my theory holds true that the Beavers can only attain short term goals (such as slaying Goliath's behind energetic crowds), then tonight's game versus a middle of the pack Cougar team should see the team revert to a double-digit loss. However, maybe I am just flat out wrong, and the Washington victory will have instilled so much confidence the Beavers go on a second half run. You can definitely make that argument, and I have a twinge of hope that it's true. This is one of those situations where I'd love to eat crow. The bottom line is line is that what I wrote is all just fun, thought provoking wankery, and the fact that fans are excited about a men's basketball game for maybe the third time this season (and first in months) has to mean something. That being said, I have what you'd call tempered enthusiasm, and I'm not one to believe in "change" until I see it. The trend is your friend.

Cougs 71-59

TV: FSN

Radio: KPAM

Stream: None

Opportunity Knocks (Again)…

47

Per ninersnation, Reggie Davis to the 49ers.

http://www.ninersnation.com/2011/2/4/1974937/49ers-announce-new-coaches-interesting-connections

When Nigel Burton left, the Beavers had a great opportunity to hire an uber-recruiter. They hired Keith Heyward. Keith was a terrible recruiter his first couple cycles, but he's slowly become adequate.

Now Riley has been handed another opportunity. Does he seize it?

This hire will be very interesting…

Basketball: Washington @ Oregon State

91

At 6pm tonight, the Beavs tip off the second half of their season versus the Huskies. Yay? Since we all know the game will be a blowout, I'm not going to waste time writing about it. This afternoon I am getting a crown on a left molar, and I'm left wondering which is going to be more painful: the tooth or watching this game. Anyway, I copied the writeup below from the official site. It will give you an idea what to expect tonight in the event that the word "Washington" didn't already paint the picture.

THE SERIES: Oregon State and Washington meet for the 288th time in history with the Huskies holding a 152-135 advantage. Washington won the first meeting this season, 103-72, on Jan. 8 in Seattle.

vs. WASHINGTON: Oregon State has lost eight straight to Washington, its second-longest drought against a Pac-10 team to the 12-game losing streak to UCLA. The teams played on Jan. 8 in Seattle and the Beavers jumped out to a 37-28 lead before the Huskies went on a 12-2 run to take a 40-39 lead at halftime. Washington scored 75 points in the final 23:25 to win, 103-72. Jared Cunningham had 21 points and Roberto Nelson added 15 to lead the Beavers. The Huskies won all three meetings last season, including a come-from-behind, 59-52, victory in the first round of the Pac-10 Tournament. The Beavers last win over the Huskies was 73-65 on Feb. 22, 2007 at Gill Coliseum and their last win at Hec Edmundson Pavilion was 80-72 on Feb. 20, 2003.

INTERESTING STAT: The Beavers are 4-0 when shooting 50 percent or better from the field and 4-0 when their opponent shoots under 40 percent from the field.

TV: FSN

Radio: KPAM

Stream: channelsurfing.net has been raided by the government.

Discussion: Letters of Intent (Afternoon)

219

The last post was getting cluttered. In here let's discuss what's transpired so far today, etc.

So far signing day has been status quo. No poaching either way. Pretty boring day overall. I held out a small hope we’d land a signing day surprise, but as is their wont, the staff failed to deliver. It’s a good class by OSU standards, but we needed some positive twists on signing day in order for this class to be special, especially in comparison to some other classes around the conference. Our benchmark shouldn’t be the 2007 Beaver class. It should be the 2011 Oregon, USC, Cal, and Washington classes, and we fail pretty miserably by those standards. It doesn’t mean we won’t be competitive, but it does mean we won’t get over the hump.

Still on the board are White, Moreland, and Dockery. Personally, I think we land none of them, but for you pessimists with latent hope, that trio will give you something for which to secretly hope.