413 COMMENTS

  1. Our boy “Bright” sounds a bit more realistic this week. This per the GT on the Bronco O’s tendency to present multiple looks:
    “It looks like one thing but it’s always another,” Ugwoegbu said. “So we’re going to have to be sound in our keys and a lot of our technique.”

  2. I’ve been watching this csu Minnesota game to try and get a better feel for the beavs. No success idk what to think other than Minnesota isn’t blowing by their rt.

  3. Once again watching the Minnesota game and there was a targeting play reviewed and it was clearly helmet to helmet but wasn’t called despite replay clearly showing that it was. Wow! Minnesota dirty?

  4. Today we dine in Hell. This one is for the right to live in the NW. We are taking this Victory and better dam sure seize every opportunity to defeat BSU. Bring bezerker energy and get the entire stadium into it from the very start.

  5. Today’s combo is what I have been waiting for. Solid with a different color helmet. Also want to see the solid black with white helmets sometime this year.

    Go Beavs. Ride these Broncos into the ground.

  6. Keep seeing more and more in state kids as visitors for today’s game. Pretty impressive collection, especially considering Oregon is playing at home today too. Let’s hope the Beavs and coaching staff put on a good show for them.

  7. I have a theory. Langsdorf is hacking into our headsets when our Off. Coordinators are making calls but it’s static-y and so it’s half his retarded plays and half ours.

  8. I’m more concerned about the D and the non ability to stop the run. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Oregon St currently does not have the personnel to run a 3-4 scheme.

  9. Note to OSU: Never, EVER schedule Boise State again. I don’t care if they were 0-12 the season before, there’s just no reason to risk it.

  10. The defense is actually doing a good enough job. Problem is, the offense is so putrid the defense has no time to rest, and they’re getting worn down as a result.

  11. Clearly this dismal performance is because Stansbury left. How do you expect them to play with heart, when their hearts are obviously crushed?

    Go ducks – er I mean huskers – uh I mean beavs! #toldya #suckitcowvallis

  12. I had hopes for growth today.
    I have to admit I’m a bit surprised at how totally crappy the Beavs look.
    I seriously doubt we will win another game.

  13. Our best offense has been when we run right at them, Nall had a 14 yd run and Pearce an 8 yd. run. But we try and run wide and Boise St penetration kills us. We are trying to be too cute. Nall has only carried it 5 times and Pearce once.

  14. Knew this game was over when the Beavs got the 1st turnover and then ran that awful trick play backwards. Gotta run up the gut there and score a TD. Instead they run backwards and miss a FG. Game over.

    Good teams convert that into a TD. Bad teams do what the Beavs did. Garrettson isn’t impressive at all.

    • Spot on Angry. We were on the 21 yard line and went 7 yards backwards on 1st play instead of a pounding run forwards to amp up the pressure on Boise.

      • This walkon looks much better than Garrettson so far.
        Leads a TD drive on his 2nd possession, throws a nice ball…

        Then again, Mitchell looked good early on last year. Still, pretty interesting.

  15. Baldwin was a better OC than these two guys.
    Too bad GA has impatience and nepotism and gave the job to an in-law, after just one season with really bad personnel and Collins at QB.

  16. If we’re starting a walk on an to start the 3rd qtr, is there a walk on play caller anywhere one sideline to replace who ever the fuck is calling plays?

  17. I never thought our coaching could get worse but this is showing me how unprepared this Beaver team is.This coaching staff is questionable at best.

    • That’s right. Blount looking better than Garretson and main reason is because we are running the football straight ahead. This should be 60% of our play calls. Recruit some good O-linemen that are specialists in run blocking. Then incorporate some play action off that.

  18. This walkon looks much better than Garrettson so far.
    Leads a TD drive on his 2nd possession, throws a nice ball…

    Then again, Mitchell looked good early on last year. Still, pretty interesting.

    Sorry, had to double post, forgot my password.

    • It’s frustrating that no matter the coaching staff, bloggers and fans can call a better game. Maybe these guys are too close to see the obvious.

      • I wouldn’t quite say bloggers and fans call a better game, but I would say that whoever was calling the offensive play was vastly overthinking things. Sometimes, you just need to pound it down the middle.

  19. I think it looks like Blount is the reason we are looking better on offense but I believe it;s because we started running the football straight at them instead of wide and that has been very effective.

  20. So apparently Blount sniped McMaryion for 2nd string? I’m assuming we’re still trying to preserve Moran’s redshirt.

    Who’s the scout team QB? Moran or Blount?

  21. Back to that 4th down, I would have liked to see the fake to Nall and the QB run. This guy seems to move fine and Boise was clearly selling out on the run. QB run or play action was the call there. Nall up the middle was okay (not an awful call), but once you see Boise stack the line it makes the odds of getting the 1st somewhere else go up.

  22. Here we go again, terrible play calling. Do these coaches not realize that running straight ahead has been working. Why now are we trying to be something we aren’t.

  23. Getting a little too pass focused and cute again. Have to maintain straight ahead runs with Pierce and Nall so down and distance is workable.

  24. Why have we totally given up on the run? It is what got us back in this game. Our play calling is like their is only 2 minutes left in game.

    • Baldwin deserves another shot. Felt people got on him last year when the problem was Collins…he would have tied the hands of any OC. Baldwin’s offenses are historically great.

  25. I feel the same way I felt with our old coaching staff. We were totally out coached in this game. We played a good 3rd qtr by running the football and our staff decided to be cute and it cost us. Blount did a good job, but his success was because of the running game. Our play calling in the 4th qtr. was horrible, they went away from what was working and called plays like we were in 2 minute offense. This was a game we could have won with better coaching.

  26. Bronco’s are gonna remember the name Blount…..for more than one reason/more than one season/more than one team from the state of Oregon.

  27. O line isn’t good enough to wait for plays to develop for passing plays. OC should call mainly run plays. Quick throws. Bootlegs. Then MAYBE Play action after we’ve established the run. Just boggles my mind. I hope GA addresses this. Cause this was just poorly called.

    • I started the preseason thinking the Beavs could whip the Buffs, not so much now! Wow, didn’t expect them to do well w/o their first string QB.

  28. This might be the worst Oregon defense they’ve had. Previous years, they at least had the speed to contain the edges in the running game. Can’t even stop that anymore.

  29. Couple comments by GA post game:
    -some young guys on D stepped up in 2nd half (not sure I can ID them).
    -Garrett was not 100% during the week, left open the possibility of a two QB system.

    Nall made it clear that Blount had practiced as the backup during the week. With the limited time the local scribes are allowed to watch practice, his appearance was a big surprise; what a difference from the last staff and their open practices.

    • Good for the buffs, but not a fan of their coach preaching postgame with more God references than a priest on Sunday. Maybe Notre Dame should hire him.

  30. Final thoughts on the game:
    1) Need to score on two of the turnovers.
    2) Run the ball Anderson!
    3) If passing; needed more rollouts and screen passes.

    • Blount in because Garretson’s leg injury. Until entering the game Blount had never practiced with the ones. In other words he did as well as he did without the benefit of “playing catch” with the receivers he was throwing to. Imo that makes his performance even more impressive.

      • So he never had practiced with the 1’s, and even though McMaryion had, we went with the least experienced guy? This move just seems more like a knee jerk message to the team to shake things up and light a fire under the ass of the usual #1’s. If they knew Garretson was gimpy enough to have Blount practice a little with the 2’s, why not have him take some pracrice reps with the 1’s to prepare for this circumstance?

        Wonder how long till McMaryion transfers out too?
        Maybe it’s not a big loss if he goes, but at some point it would be nice to have a qb last more than 1-2 seasons.

        Bad personnel management in my opinion…

        • I’m not so sure it’s bad management. It is certainly a clear message to all the guys not playing that they can be given a chance and to all the starters that their job is not locked up. It was definitely a wake-up call. The other half of this experiment has yet to reveal itself; how do guys respond? Maybe the answer to that question is the important bit.

          • I’m just saying, it’s bad management from the standpoint of wanting to put your team in the best position to win. Blount maybe should have practiced with the 1’s at least a little in practice, for his benefit and the benefit of the other guys playing with him. Having their 1st snaps together happen in a live game seems almost like a public shaming.

          • Yes, the response of the team is the bottom line. I’d have thought any complacent players would already have gotten the message. You make a good point about the encouragement this kind of move may give to guys further down the depth chart.

            GA is giving all of us a continuing look at the hard ass (read: serious) management which was missing for so long. This move to send a message to #1’s that they have to perform to keep their jobs follows the departure over the last year of several SA’s who saw the writing on the wall. And in a radio interview this week GA made it clear that if guys want to leave “we’ve got a piece of paper that makes that really easy”.

            Seems to me that (SO FAR) the majority of the players are responding well to GA’s serious approach; I don’t see apathy on the sidelines anything like was so obvious with the previous staff. Gotta wonder how long these guys will continue to fight. As GA recently said, he has been through these rebuilds before but these players have not.

            This group badly needs a couple conference wins…… Cal? WSU? Zona? Nike?

  31. Didn’t play “big time football” in the first half? Didn’t watch due to prolonged beer drinking after the game here in MPLS. What happened?

  32. I’m not a psychologist and I don’t play one on TV either. But, it seems like going into the Colorado game, we are looking at a (best case?) scenario where the Beavs got their collective arses kicked in the first half but played hard in the second while the Buffs are on an extreme high beating UO. My hope here is that CU falls flat and the Beavs show a little pride.

    On a side note, I think that after all the punts the Beavs have made, they have still given up 0 yards on returns. That’s a pretty ridiculous stat.

    • Yup…. Special teams has been a quiet positive….that good coverage, onside kick, Bolden return and 40 yard field goal was exactly what they needed to give them confidence in their game. I don’t expect those things every game, but things are looking bright for the STs.

  33. My recap of the game –

    1. BSU was just plain faster and stronger. All the weightlifting stories from the offseason were just puff pieces.
    2. WIth Blount playing, that’s 5 QBs in two years for GA. Not a good sign.
    3. Nall is slow to the edges. Best runs were up the middle.
    4. Defense sucks. Were beat to the edge many many times.
    5. 2 turnovers, zero points. Terrible.
    6. Oline needs to step it up if the Beavs are going to win any conference games.

    • All what weightlifting stories? You’ve been going off on a comment in an article from two months ago as if someone here keeps throwing it in your face. You’re the only one talking about it… repeatedly… with nobody else commenting on what I can only assume they believe is someone muttering weird, off-topic stuff to themselves for no reason.

      The rest is just no-brainer stuff.

      • IIRC, the comment in that article from two months ago was that when GA took over only four (?) players could squat 500+ pounds, and now there were over 50 players who could do so.

        The reason nobody really carried that water (even though you pretend everyone has done so relentlessly) is because even that’s not normal for an NCAA football team. It was a snapshot of how dilapidated the program had become, not a story setting hopeful expectations.

    • When you say “quickly” I assume you mean next season, right? Because he’s certainly not going to go out and find a top QB right now to come in and be the savior of this season. So yeah, he needs to put a very good QB in place next season. But I don’t want him to follow the Duck model and bring in one-year band aides. He needs someone who will lead this team for 3-4 years. Maybe Conor Blount is that guy. Maybe he gets more playing time this year and ends coming out of training camp next year as the clear starter. The big question is what are they going to do this year? The O-line is bad, so if GA has any thoughts of the future with Blount, does GA play him a bunch more this year and risk getting him hurt, or does he save him for next year and remain loyal to his commitment to Garretson?

    • A big QB recruit wouldn’t do anything for the program at this point. You think some inexperienced true freshman out there running for his life is going to make a difference?

      This team needs juco offensive line bodies, quality ones. Everything else would fall into place.

      • They need both.
        Moran was a pretty big recruit. Get a few more guys like that and you’re looking good.
        I don’t trust GA with QB evaluation or development

  34. Okay they should have ran more and should have ran more with Pierce. But I’ll take this coaching staff over a Riley staff any day. Riley would have stuck with Garretson on one leg and there would have been no adjustments at halftime. Give GA time. He will improve this team.

    CASEY FOR AD!

  35. Yes give this staff time and the program will turn around. That being said how much time? I’m almost to the point where I think year 5 will be the breakthrough year. GA has a serious problem with the quarter back issue. Blunt did look good but it was the run game that set up his success. How many years does garretson have left? Maybe the answer is Blount but his sample size is so small, I don’t know. Hell maybe they should throw him into the fire and leave him there.It’s not like they have an easy w left on the schedule. Invest in the future of the program.

  36. After Nall’s breakout game last year, the next game featured…practically no Nall.

    In this game, Nall and Pierce opened the second half with surprising success. So, you guessed it, practically no run game in the fourth quarter.

    Blount does an inspiring job coming seemingly out of nowhere to spark the team, smooth in handoffs and throwing some just plain pretty passes. So, say it with me…no quarterback controversy, according to GA, no, no. He’ll go back to second or third string as soon as it can be arranged.

    Odd pattern here. I think GA has gone far enough coasting on being not-Riley. I really am wondering about the coaching decisions here.

    There was no excuse for the level of unpreparedness we saw in the first half of this one.

  37. My view is that right now this team would be best off getting under center and running an I formation offense with a vertical passing game based around play action.

    I know this isn’t what Anderson wants to do but that is the best use of the talent on the roster.

    Nall is better running right at the defense, a power running game is easier for a line to block for, and a vertical passing game would be a better fit for virtually every receiver on the roster. Collins is the only receiver that fits a short passing game heavy offense but he could also handle going deeper.

    If I were in charge that is what I’d spend the week doing. Sometimes you gotta do what fits your talent till you get the talent to fit your system.

    • Despite that statement I have not given up on Anderson and like him. I think much like Mike MacIntyre at Colorado this is a full on rebuild that will take time. I liked MacIntyre from the moment I first saw a Colorado coached game and knew he’d turn that program around. I feel similar about Anderson but think Anderson could get more out of the current roster with some tweaks.

    • I think angry said it above, “why is it that fans and bloggers can see problems overlooked by coaches”.

      Why aren’t Nall and Pierce used more? Especially between the tackles? Off tackle and fly work better if they are the exception rather than the rule.

      Nothing wrong with dink n dunk slants.

      Is GA too detached from the O?……….Seems so.

      • I don’t know. I have been a high school coach for 15 years almost exclusively working on the offensive side of the ball. And it that role you get used to having to adjust to the players you get. I think Anderson has a system he wants to implement and if I were guessing I would guess he probably thinks that in order to recruit guys to fit that system he needs to be running it on Saturdays. Its a tough position I’ve never experienced but that’d be my guess.

        And frankly, he might be correct. If you want a spread QB but are running a power I; that kid might question why he’d go to OSU.

        I think Anderson wants to win (obviously) but thinking he might be looking at the bigger picture whereas us fans and bloggers don’t have to do that.

    • The thing I’m not sure about is this: can the OL open the holes necessary to have a running game? Right now I’m thinking they can’t and won’t be able to this season. For the most part the starters are what would be the 2nd and 3rd stringers if the kids who’ve left the team (medical issues, etc.) were still playing.

      • I think they’d have a better chance in a straight ahead power running game, yes. Not saying they’d be great but Nall is not a cut back runner and a zone blocking scheme requires a runner to cutback far more often. I think a man blocking scheme would make the line look better.

        A power run scheme could also help the passing game by creating more effective play action opportunities to slow down the pass rush which can also help the line.

        • I hope you’re right youngorst. I hope you’re right. The images that are burned into my brain are the other team’s DL in our backfield and/or our RB reaching the LOS and there being no hole for them to go through. Thus the argument for the RB’s having to be able to make cuts. Which, yet again, makes me think Nall would be of more use to the team at another position.

      • The coaches better get on it and come up with strategies to keep that running game going….I think we can all agree that this particular team should be run first, it is their strength….go with it until the opposing stops it. The play calling has me worried too, but I would hope that we don’t see this type of play calling in the future now that the coaches have game tape to solve what they missed during the game.
        We need a key upset win (Oregon), and a Cal/WSU win to get anything out of this season.

  38. I hope nobody thought Garrettson was going to be a savior. He was a servicable mid-major QB (you have to consider some of the competition he had in the Mountain West). He transferred because he was going to be Kent Myers back up. He is an upgrade over what the Beavs had last year, but that doesn’t mean he is anywhere near consistent P-12 level. Beavs still need a QB, maybe Blount? Who knows at this point?

  39. I think it might be bad for morale to bail on team captain Garretson this quickly.

    It won’t be surprise if Beavs don’t win again this season. There will be plenty of opprtunities for Blount to get PT and male a stronger case for himself.

    Critical to keep team together as losses pike up, and critical to recruit with little to sale at this point other than a new locker room and early PT.

    BTW – How was the terrace?

  40. Where does this leave Moran? I’d like to know the logic re playing Blount instead of burning Moran’s red shirt.

    Is Blount better than Moran or is Blount the sacrificial lamb? Since the OL is being populated mostly by what should be 2nd or 3rd stringers whoever we put in at QB will more than likely be maimed before the season is over so we’ll put in Blount and thus not risk Moran getting injured. I’m not saying that was the thought process but I have to wonder if something like that is going on.

  41. I hope Gina will do a piece on the Blount/Baldwin connection. Why would a quarterback be met at the sidelines each time by someone who is not the quarterback coach?

    I wonder if GA has set up (or has tacitly allowed) a sort of fiefdom among his coaches. They stake out their territories in whatever way they can, and he lets them go at it.

    Might lead to some interesting possibilities down the line. But it also might be why GA is able to say (and the team proves on the field) that they have no offensive identity.

    If identity is the problem, then it starts with GA (and not GA just saying that over and over), and the relationships he fosters among the coaching staff. Musical chairs hasn’t helped so far. This team has been playing as if there were no identity, and that’s something that needs to come consistently from the top down.

    There’s something odd behind the curtain. I’d be interested in anyone else’s opinions about this.

    We’re all looking in from the outside, but we can all see what’s on the field–and that says a lot about what’s behind the coaching curtain.

    Best-case, they’ve been saving the good stuff for the Pac and what we’ve seen so far is all smoke and mirrors. We shall soon see.

    But does anyone else have some thoughts on that interesting Blount/Baldwin relationship and what it might indicate in this staff?

    • Wasn’t McGiven up in the booth calling plays? My guess is Baldwin is by default, the on field version of our offensive coordinator, and he’s probably also in communication with McGiven throughout the game. I dont think TJ Woods would be the right guy to counsil the new QB within the game.

  42. Imo the reason(s) we’re being told for taking Garrison out sound a bit…….. contrived.

    “…“There were some things that were lingering from the (Idaho State) game,” McGiven said. “Darell had hurt his foot a little bit. There was nothing major — some nicks and bruises he was fighting through the week. We weren’t able to get him into a rhythm and get him comfortable with things until the end of the practice week because of those nagging injuries. He probably didn’t have the timing and the execution he needed to function as well as he could have in this game.” …”

    Garretson couldn’t get into a “…rhythm and get him comfortable with things…” but a freshman who hadn’t practiced with the 1’s could?

    Uhhhhh

    • I intended to include the bit about “….He probably didn’t have the timing and the execution he needed to function as well as he could have in this game….”

      • Reading between the lines, IMO, we’re being told that Garretson’s timing and execution sucked so they yanked him. Which again, IMO, may or may not be fixable. So we’re back, yet again, to having a freshman lead the team. Buckle up boys, it’s going to be a long year. Or should I have said an even longer year…..

    • In my opinion, a foot or leg injury that doesnt cause u to visibly limp should not affect your passing that much. If anything, it should affect ur scrambling. Yet, Blount threw for 138 yds versus Garretsons 53. He nearly tripled DG up. A difference that big cannot and should not be ignored by the coaches. If blount was in all game and threw for 275 yds, would we have won?

      GA may not want to upset DG too much for now, but I dont think DGs job is very safe and it shouldnt be cosidering the performance…

      I will check how many yds dg threw for against MN and ID.

      Go beavs

      • One of the things I thought that was better for the Beavs was that in the 2nd half the offense was on the field more which was good for the defense.

        The only way we will win, as soon as we would like, is to have the offense play better and keep the D off the field. Obvious , eh?

        Barring that, patience is required.

  43. You are reading my mind. That’s why I posted during the game when I saw Blount and Baldwin together so often.

    I asked Gina in a comment on Olive if she’d look into this. She has, in the past and slowly, responded to prompting like this (see Wallace’s absence in Bend and Kearsley’s move to C) so I have some hope she will follow up. I don’t use twitter, if any degenerates here do, then it would not hurt to contact her and ask.

    She often solicits (cue BG) questions for her weekly podcast, please ask there.

    At this point we are left with speculation. I don’t believe Baldwin has a history with Blount prior to Corvallis. The simplest explanation may be that McGiven is upstairs and Woods has his own concerns, with GA so defensive oriented, someone had to work with the kid. Maybe?

    Two other items: Garretson seemed to encourage Blount on the sideline, and, did anyone see Blount on the phone with McGiven?

    EDIT: Meant as a response to blackhillsbeav above.

    • Coach A said after game that Garretson was unable to do some things (due to injury) like run. So I don’t think it was his passing as much as the game plan is for a running quarterback and Garretson was unable or unwilling to do that. So I think that was where they wanted the QB to run the ball or rollout and Garretson was not doing that.

  44. I think I’d like it better if the QB coach was on the sidelines where he could talk one on one to the QB rather than being in the booth and coaching by phone.

    • But maybe the actual (not official) QB coach was on the sidelines, in this case. I wonder if Blount is a special project of Baldwin’s.

  45. Jahmal Wynter, the Georgia DL who visited this weekend tweeted about his visit and says “See you soon Beavernation”

    If a guy from GA plans to see us soon, sounds like a good bet he will be a commit in the near future. Can’t imagine he’d be traveling back west for any other reason.

    https://twitter.com/Havo_c/status/780132687356899328
    Thanks to the staff @BeaverFootball I enjoyed my time in Corvallis see you soon #BeaverNation

  46. Now we have a toughness problem in the opposite direction, Garretson too hobbled to be effective.

    Who’s the best replacement at h-back since Togiai is out, Nall? Is that the best for the offense as a whole? Is mcmaryion hobbled too?

  47. I think Garretson getting hit so many times really shook him. He just has not been making the same reads and going through his progressions. Now he really doesn’t have much time, but I think when Blount went in he often took that extra second for the next read or used his legs to buy an extra second. I would have like to see Lucas get the ball thrown his way more, maybe at least a screen or something. I also think the run game was hit and miss, I mean yeah they found success but only when down 31 to 7 in the second half. If you can’t get one yard on 4th and 1, why would they magically have been able to pound it up the middle all the other times? I do think they left the run too early in the first half after multiple short gains. Maybe the second half is enough of a turning point to come in and hit Colorado you may still be on the high beating the Ducks overlook the beavs

  48. Eggers with a little more on Blount yesterday. McGiven was in communication via phone blount during the game. Also, very little said about McMaryion. Won’t be surprised to hear he wants to transfer out. Time to start recruiting another 2017 or JUCO QB.

    http://portlandtribune.com/pt/12-sports/324527-204158-oregon-state-has-a-new-backup-plan-at-qb?utm_source=New+Media&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PortlandTribune+%28Portland+Tribune%29

  49. Can we move GA over to athletic director and bring in Les Miles and Dave Aranda.
    GA l’s got that gift of gab that would fit well in the AD role.

    No, I’m not serious, but i do think GA could make a good AD some day

    • The only concern I currently have about GA as AD is if he hires coaches like he hired assistants then……….. In other words, so far I’m not impressed the assistants who are in the foreground and you notice. Folks like Baldwin and possibly the QB/OC coach. But I keep telling myself I have to give them time before coming to a conclusion. But…..

      P.S. Is Eggers reading this board? :-)

    • INTEROFFICE MEMO

      Chip:

      We must reject your request to HR hire Willie “Will” Lyles as our Director of Player Personnel. We understand you are concerned with our team’s talent level and that you previously enjoyed a productive relationship with Mr. Lyles. However, we are not convinced his credentials are adequate for the competitive nature of the NFL. In fact, attached to his resume was a scouting report that included a deceased player. Further, we cancelled the unauthorized check you already provided Mr. Lyles. You are hereby reminded not to attempt unauthorized payments again.

      Good luck next Sunday! About that roster, if life gives you lemons, well, we’ll end up firing you, I’m not going to lie.

      Trent Baalke, General Manager

  50. Anyone know for sure if Togiai qualifies for medical redshirt? I believe he does. We haven’t even started Pac-12 play yet. He actually provides one more piece in future seasons to look forward to. Today’s commit Fauatea says he is excited to play with Togiai which is cool.

  51. Porebsky will be getting nice punts off in Colorado this week with the altitude. Our defense will keep us in games this year, but we lack depth to keep the team fresh. I was quite impressed with Blount. He had 3 missed reads where we had guys wide open if he’d gone through his progressions; however, he certainly can throw a deep ball where only our guy can get it.

    I’m glad to see our receivers(minus the ripped pick 6 off of SC) go up and get the balls. That was one thing that has been lacking the past 2 games.

  52. Is Jake Cookus our main special teams coach? Would make sense why that squad seems sharper than previous years(except Bolden’s wild punt receptions in the first couple if games)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here