People have gotten on me for my comments about McCoy, but we’re about to hit game 6, and he has 2 passing TDs and 1 INT and a measly 6.2 yard per pass average. I don’t really care if he can run for 213 yards over 5 games. 40 yards per game rushing is not worth having a guy with only 2TDs and who can’t really extend the field.

That said, I think Nevada is bad enough that it will work again.

I’m going Beavs in a close one: 21-20

It’s nice being a position where if the Beavs lose my hometown team wins. A can’t lose position for a Beaver? I’ll take it.

That said, I think the Beavs blowout the rams.

Beavs 42-17

Poor CSU.

Now this is a game the Beavs should definitely win.

56-17, Beavs.

I was just reading up how last week was the worst loss in Purdue’s history. So while people are rightfully down on them, I still feel like they can’t be that bad, and the law of averages will make this a close game between two ugly teams. This is like Ron Jeremy banging the female version of Ron Jeremy. Purdue has more room to average out, so I’m still thinking they win this by 2 or 3, but unlike ridiculous claims made here earlier in the week, I hope to be wrong – may our Ron Jeremy jizz last!

(Nobody can accuse me of using ChatGPT to write my game threads). ;)

Gooo Beavs.

Now that we know what the Beavs are all about, what’s the feeling about Purdue? These teams appear to be equally bad, so it comes down to the Beavs having a home edge and Purdue having a cohesive team and P5 talent edge.

I’ll take my chances on the latter, but this will probably be close and ugly.

26-24, Purdue on a missed game winning FG by the Beavs. How’s that for specific?