410 COMMENTS

  1. I’m having a rare pre-game cocktail. Figure I need it if Stanford is suddenly Stanford and their backup is all-world, which knowing the luck o’ da Beavs….

    • Really dumb check down on 2nd and short to the exact same run play as well. Stalled that drive. The advantage of experienced QB’s should be avoiding dumb plays like that

  2. Luton kills a great drive by locking on to a double covered Hosgins instead of tucking and running.

    Choukair misses another long FG.

    Same old same old so far.

  3. Makes sense we go with the out of character orange unis instead of black….or maybe since it isn’t 90+ degrees the black unis are left in the closet. Ha!

  4. Wtf… this is bad.. we had a bye to prepare for them yet We’re checking into the wrong run play over and over again From and obvious formation.. what is going on!?

  5. Due to the possibility of thunderstorms last minute we decided to stay home. Looks like we made a wise choice. Now I need to make another smart choice and turn off this shit show at halftime and go do something productive.

  6. Luton has had 2 drives he’s killed by choosing to throw rather than scrambling a few extra yards for the 1st down and resetting.
    At least Gebbia can be counted on to get a few yards on the ground in those situations.
    Hope he gets some significant time in the 2nd half, but you know he wont as long as Luton is still standing

  7. That’s way too easy.
    I have 3 major coaching errors.
    At what point do we start talking a new staff?
    Smith sticking with Luton is killing us he’s not a pac QB.

  8. I’m beginning to be anti Smith.
    His inability to see choker, Togia, and Luton are not winning players is a serious flaw.
    You have to be able to analyze talent and adjust/admit error.
    Hodgins is covering for just how bad the decisions are.

      • When you have the personnel they’re just sitting then it’s a coaching problem.
        90% of coaching is talent evaluation/getting the players that give your team the best chance of winning on the field. There is no argument to be made that’s Choker, Luton, or Togia. Zero. If these guys can’t analyze talent and do that they need to go. If they see that and can’t make the difficult decision because it’s difficult, they also need to go.

  9. Went from being the only team scoring on all first possessions of the game to….scoring a big fat zero against a weak Stanford team….Ha!

  10. Luton can pass, but that’s it. Overall he is a huge detriment to the team. What’s wrong with our head couch. Please, please, please get Gebbia in there!!!!!!!!! Pull that Offensive coordinator and get Gebbia in there John. Be a coach, not a puppet.

    • I’m having a hard time pinpointing any one thing Luton is good at. If you just looked at his stats you would say decision making because he has no INT’s, but he routinely throws it at defenders. He doesn’t have arm strength and he’s missed multiple open receivers today.

  11. So the classic formula from us in the first half:

    Bad blocking(giving up sacks that cost us points/drives);
    Cannot stop ANY pass;
    Cannot stop ANY 3rd down attempt

    Pretty tough to beat any real game with you don’t block and don’t stop the pass. Again.

    I still think talent is 90% of the problem, but yeah, starting Luton/Togiai is not helping, so that’s on Smith.

    • If you throw in smart/disciplined play as “talent”, I fully agree. Need smarter players that understand blocking – on both sides of the ball.

  12. What is with the P-12 Network media and this false narrative about Luton making some amazing body transformation in the off-season? The one idiot analyst was babbling about it on a play where lumbering Luton was sacked! WTF?

  13. I expect Stanford to adjust, pass more in the second half, and pull away quickly. It should be obvious our secondary isn’t stopping anyone and our run D has been surprisingly good.

  14. What I don’t get is why waste a year with Luton, he’s not your QB and he’s only eligible by the random decisions of the NCAA. It would have been a perfect scenario to name Gebbia the starter and let Luton either stay as a back-up or try the transfer portal.

  15. Oregon State should move all non baseball programs down to FCS or at the very least join a non-Power 5 conference. We don’t pour enough money into our sports programs to compete at the Power-5 level and the gap is only growing wider by the year. There are a lot of schools that are D1 in Baseball and compete at a lower level in other sports. Oregon State needs to join them

  16. Lol man.. that was such a nut kick of a first half.. yet if we can score to start the second we are right there despite the terrible coaching and play. Like wtf is the deal with the audible into that same run play from the pistol formation on every pivotal down. Whose idea was that? It should stop and he should be kicked square in the nuts.

  17. Ok that pass to Taylor was incomplete but it looks like it DID hit him in the hands, damn.

    What is with these runs? They’re only bringing like 4 guys and we can’t get anywhere on the ground.

  18. No points with Luton through 2 quarters.. He’s continued to make mistakes. Why not try out Gebbia?

    Smith’s lovefest with Luton is starting to remind me of GAs with Seth.

  19. The time for Gebbia to win this game for us has passed.
    It’s not like he’d be perfect. Needed to allow him a few dud drives and get him in sooner.
    Now only the ghost of Jack can win this.

  20. Millionth third down conversion for Stanford.

    Jesus Christ.

    Literally every year I’m like “Where are our linebackers? Why do they NEVER make plays?” And here we are again. LBs that make no plays, every 3rd down converted.

    • And another FR QB w/a highly efficient, effective game against the Beavers. Anyone who telecasts the Beavers should analyze and show that history and pattern. Remarkable.

  21. What will the excuses for the coaches be this time around? The Stanford offense is WEAK. They have an inexperienced QB. Their OL is injured. No prolific backs.

  22. Was that a stop on 3rd down? WHAT JUST HAPPENED?

    Of course we then let the punt go like 60 yards and pin us on the 5. Can our PR not call fair catch? Come on.

  23. Glad I didn’t go to this game, glad i’m not watching, just checking in here.

    The most disappointing thing is the outcomes thus far aren’t at all surprising.

    The program is missing a chance to win sone fans back..

  24. Luton robbed of another pick.
    That won’t pass review since he touched out of bounds while bobbling the ball.
    Although, pac12 refs could still f up the call.

  25. That was just a terrible decision by the 12th year senior. Throwing on the sideline to double coverage AND throwing it to the inside.

    Whether this review turns into an INT or not, just a hideous decision.

  26. Guys, I just don’t get it. Luton has only 1 receiver he throws to, can’t run, and worst of all can’t pass. To let this guy continue to play is beyond nuts, and a program demolition.
    I’m done watching or reading about this , probably forever. It’s just sad that has come down to this.
    This says nothing about the pathetic defense.

  27. Any bets on how this will end?

    A. Beavs tie it up and then go ahead to win

    B. Beavs don’t score again

    C. Beavs tie it up and lose on missed field goal

    D. Beavs tie it up, but lightning strikes the stadium and game is cancelled. Tie game

  28. That was Shawn Wilson, btw, who fucking fell over on that TD pass. Because defending an unathletic QB on a pass route was too much for him. Just incredible. I’m relatively sure half of our botched pass defenses have his name on them.

  29. Stanford knee isn’t down, when Baylor collecting ball…..you would think the booth could deduce that the ball HAD TO BE LOOSE before the pile hit the ground. Luck O’da Beavs!

      • ….and if you look at the reaction of Tree guy, he’s trying/scrambling/reaching for ball knowing that he lost it — players only do that when they know they fumbled it.

  30. So this play calling the last 3 series has been great, uptempo, solid runs and passes. Why do we have to wait for shit like this, why cant they do this from the start?

    • Luton seems 1000% better in a spread, hurry-up offense, or when we’re down 50. Not sure which.

      God DAMMIT that special teams play. Just devastating. Finding a new way to lose.

    • Yeah, like most games there are several moments on both sides that “Changed the game”. Like Luton’s 2 picks that weren’t picks(the failed challenge one and the Hodgins bailout). That Hamelcar play cost us points, but so did our double penalties in the red zone, and the double personal fouls. Just brutal.

      3 point loss. From being down 21-0 at half that seems good, but…can we just play a full game? Like, once? Same thing with the Oklahoma St game AND Hawaii.

      • Plays that lead to the loss in my mind:

        Choukair getting blocked

        Luton taking a sack (and then out of FG range) at the end of 1st half

        Leverage penalty that gave furd 7 instead of settling for 3

        Kick return by furd at end of the game

        Any or all of those change and beavs win

  31. And now we will hear how the Beavs outscored Stanford in the last 25 or so minutes. Outscoring the Tree 28 to 10………..after being down 21-0…………BFD

    And, sure, OSU got more yds and first downs than the winner.

  32. The problem with being at all invested is that at some point there has to be a payoff. This is like going to a casino, sitting at a slot machine, and every pull is a loss. Not even the occasional payout even as you come out behind overall. You’d want to leave and do something fun.

    • Basic psychology, irregular rewards have a longer lasting effect on behavior than consistent/reliable outcomes. That said, it’s to the point that the (positive) rewards are so extremely irregular that many more may stop caring.

    • I guess as an alum I have to disagree with you. They are my team and I’m going to support them, period. I’ll bitch when things aren’t being done well (or I wouldn’t be on this site) but I won’t walk away, particularly when I’m seeing improvement as I am this year. I’ll leave that for Yankee and Duck fans.

  33. I thought that trick play where their QB (as a receiver no less) out-smarted two defensive backs who were in the right position, but somehow played fucking Keystone Cops and fell down sort of sums up the game and what it means to be a Beaver fan. I thought for sure that was going to be an interception. What’s wrong with me?

  34. I was with some of you in that once Stanford had a decent return, Smith should have let them score. We would have had two timeouts with minute and a half — assume we score and go for two, Stanfords D was winded, and Pierce could have walked in for the win. At least we go down with the hot hand, rather than let Stanford milk the clock for slow death.

      • I mean, we’ve seen smart players just take a knee before scoring, too, so the clock still runs out. Maybe Stanford does that, or maybe they just score and take their chance with our offense again. Either way, I don’t think the ONLY way to play that out is to let them score. Certainly an option, but so it just getting a stop. They weren’t in the red zone, the return brought them to the 35. Far from a certainty there.

        • The returner got them to the 50. In three plays they got inside the redzone. The QB scramble was the game ender and where they needed to let Stanford score on that play or the next. It’s smarter to have control of the ball and determine your own fate at that point, especially with two timeouts.

          I mean you can do many things including what Smith did but those things are not in your favor.

          • The mistake was on smith and co hurrying up to score the td on first down. Could have at least let the play clock run down and give stanford the ball with closer to a minute left. Stanford had no timeouts and an inexperienced qb.

          • Some coaches would choose to do a medium depth squib type kick, hope that the receiving team has to down it around the 30 given that Standford had no time outs. Also, what happened to Choukair’s leg, it would have been a perfect time for a touchback. It should also be mentioned that the pass defense was atrocious on the first play from the 50. Easy 18-yard pitch and catch, very soft coverage for such a crucial time in the game.

    • Serious question, has a team ever “let” the other team score in similar situations to this? I hear this argument every now and then but I don’t think I’ve ever seen it happen in my life.

  35. 500 to 350 difference on total yards. This was several crucial plays that were just critically missed by Oregon state players. Ridiculous to say this would be on Smith.

  36. Smith’s poor decisions have now cost OSU 3 wins over 2 years. Nevada, Hawaii, Stanford.
    We’re bad enough that we can’t afford that, obviously.

    • Really putting this on Smith huh? I have no idea how you can pull that out. Oh that’s right he should have been playing instead of Wilson on that Td pass. Oh and he should have subbed himself in to tackle on that final kickoff. What a load of crap and easy out to say “blame it on the coach”

      • i guess if someone is going to be critical of Smith, then they have to give him credit too for the performance in the second half. Special teams play were costly and that’s on the players and not the coaches. Too many points left on the field too in first half. Kids played hard and didn’t quit and I’ll credit Smith and his staff and players for the tough effort. People always looking to blame someone though….nature of the beast.

        • One critique of Lindgren is why was Kolby Taylor so involved in the first half instead of Champ Flemings. I thought switching Taylor for Flemings is one of the main reasons for our improvement at the end.

      • Hes the coach, hes responsible for every guy who is on the field. Hes also responsible for how poorly coached and undisciplined the players are. So hamilcar jumping over lineman is a personal foul, that’s a rule, he should have been coached on that, its a rule in football. Obviously he wasnt coached. Repeatedly putting a kicker who cant kick……to kick in the game is the coach’s fault.

    • Yup. One reason I give Smith more of a pass than Angry. EVERY coach deserves some blame after losses. But what can you do when Stanford throws into a double team on a QB playing receiver, and your guys just flail and fall and miss? He’s still working with a lot of crappy GA recruits and young recruits of his own.

      • That was really terrible. Wilson hasn’t look that bad before at least but that should have been an interception and was a TD instead because our guys just ran into each other like goof balls rather than make a play on the ball.. Hicks _Onu is really bad

      • I’m still giving him a pass but I’m like 99% done with him. Main reason being (a) he doesn’t learn from past mistakes. Mistakes are going to happen. Learn. (b) he doesn’t have the right personnel on the field. This was an old Riley mistake that he seems to have inherited.

        I still have a little hope. It was like 5% before this game and now it’s 1%. *insert* “So you’re telling me there’s a chance” GIF.

    • This is old hat, most of us “survivors” been through it so many times we know we’ll get through it no problem, “WE WILL SURVIVE” (Gloria Gaynor)

  37. Really weird game — beat Stanford by a long shot in every meaningful facet of the game except the score. Yardage check, first downs check, penalties check, turnovers (tie) but we’ll take it check. How the fuck did we lose this game?!?!?!?!?

  38. I watched the post game player interviews. Good Lord AP is a beast. The common theme among all the players answers was : details, details,details. I think they get it but just can’t quite get over the hump to execute all game. Also,to me, Hodgins Sounds like he’s really “football smart”.

    • Why can’t we play a full game? Against Hawaii and Oklahoma St we disappeared in the 2nd half, and this game we didn’t show up at all in the first.

      Like, our previously terrible teams would just get stomped from minute 1 to minute 60. Now we’re losing 30 minutes, winning 30 minutes(except against Oklahoma St) and barely losing the game.

      That’s progress, but it makes no sense to me.

    • I think AP is NFL caliber. Another Smith coaching mistake to add to Angry’s list. AP had one carry in the second half against Hawaii after averaging 11 YPC in the first half. Arguably, Jemar ended up with the ankle injury from overuse in the second half of that game.

  39. Clownzano with a damning article up about Oregon St not investing in its football program.

    When you hire shit coaches on the cheap that’s what you get. Shit football.

    But we have the highest paid AD (or is it 2nd highest?) in the entire conference. Ed Ray and Barnes need to be shown the door tonight. And take the shitty football coaching staff with you.

    • Football isn’t life, though. I know we all gather around the TV and live/die OSU football for 4 hours once a week for like 15 weeks, but still; money and time that is spent on a football team is money and time not spent elsewhere. I’m glad Ed Ray has focused on the academics of the school; I’d rather be us than Alabama. Cool, you produced some national champions, but can they fucking “National Champion”?

      Personally I get just as excited hearing about how awesome we’re doing at robotics competitions as I do watching us win baseball games, and there’s only so much money to go around. Maybe robotics doesn’t drive Oregonian readership like football, but it’s way more impressive and important, so give me cool academic programs and heartbreaking football every day.

      • Fact remains that none of those programs generate the buzz or revenue for the university and city that football does.

        How many people watch robotics competitions compared to football?

      • Even under the current financial situation, football doesn’t have to be heartbreaking; and it doesn’t cost a cent to properly utilize the players already on the team.

    • Yep. He’s more stable. That’s worth something.

      The frustrating part for me is it doesn’t have to be like this. There’s another kicker on the roster. Just put him in the game. He can’t be worse. And if he is then go for it on 4th.

      There are other questionable personnel decisions. That’s the one everyone agrees would make the team better, yet Smith won’t do it. With the proper players on the field we’d be 3-1. Everyone is like “hey we’re close just a few plays away”…well that doesn’t count, but what does count is actually having the right guys on the field to get to 3-1, and it’s not that hard to do.

    • Utah St is 3-1.

      Was it really an Anderson problem?

      I know he hitched his wagon to Luton. Which was his own damn fault. But some of the Anderson era failure lies squarely on Oregon St.

      I’m also willing to bet Anderson is kicking himself for ever taking this job.

      • I don’t have too strong of an opinion one way or the other but sometimes guys are better at being assistants than the are at leading a program… sure hope Smith isn’t one of those.

      • Yes, it was mostly an Anderpants problem. His offensive mismanagement esp. regarding QBs was a fatal flaw. We’re seeing better play in Smith year 2 than Anderpants year 3, and the Pantsed One took the program over in a MUCH better place than Smith did.

        • Scotty,

          Some of your arguments do have merit. I cannot or will not discredit them. Anderson has his own flaws. But he’d been successful in the past. What was the common denominator here?

          Food fort thought. Here’s the list of OSU’s past 4 head coaching hires in the four major sports WW follow…..

          Football – Jonathan Smith
          Men’s Basketball – Wayne Tinkle
          Women’s basketball – Scott Rueck
          Baseball – Mitch Canham

          Does any of those scream home run hire? Or does it say OSU is hiring coaches from lower conferences/divisions on the cheap and “hoping” it works out. Rueck so far is the only one that was a smash success.

          It also raises a question with me. Did Canham only get the job because he was willing to take less $ than Yeskie?

          Smith wasn’t the only one willing to take this job. Yes we struck out with Anderson. Why? If Anderson has been successful everywhere else?

          More than one party needs to look in the mirror on that one.

          I’ve stated Anderson quit because he realized he was never going to change the culture here. And OSU not investing in its football program is a big part of that culture.

          There’s a poster here who has a perfect username. “Hopeful ain’t a plan”

          Oregon St needs to start ponying up if they want to turn this around. I don’t like Canzano but he’s not wrong here. Nor is Anderson. It won’t matter who they fire and hire. Otherwise we’re staring down the barrel of 28 consecutive losing seasons again.

          Short of Nick Saban walking through the door of the valley football center on the cheap, “Hopeful ain’t a plan”

          Right now OSU has no plan, no vision and nothing to sell potential donors or recruits.

          So what do we do about it?

          • Fair point, but the money OSU is willing to spend and the relative performance of the people they can hire with that money are two separate issues. I think we can agree coaches here have an uphill battle given the lesser resources than the rest of the conference, though. Even so, WSU eventually got something rolling, and they’re right down there with us.

        • OSU needs to spend more money on football, but if I’m remembering correctly GA’s big issue at the time seemed to be with his assistants. He even commented to Canzano that he hired the wrong ones. What I always thought was interesting is the program was vastly improved in 2016 and then the wheels fell off again. As CEO of the program that falls on GA.

          • Anderpants’ stated reason(s) and actual are quite different. He had a semantics problem, people can hardly understand the man, it’s so bad. Quarterbacks, being some of the most intelligent players on the team, had particular difficulty understanding the man who insists on sounding like he barely finished 5th grade. For example: Anderpants’ “toughness” is equivalent to Niners’ “effort.” Anderpants is a hack. His semantics problem miffed all P5 roster and recruit quarterbacks and the rest is history.

  40. Other than the beavs this was a good day. Learned about beekeeping and ate antelope sausage for the first time. Anyone try this? It was incredible.

    • I’ve heard it is fantastic. Never had it though. If you ever get a chance, try bear made into pepperoni or breakfast sausage. That’s right up there on my favorite foods. Makes the store bought stuff taste like garbage, like you won’t want to ever eat it again. I have a local butcher/ meat processing place make mine (if I get a bear).

      • I’ve always been curious about bear but it’s hard to find and has that reputation for trichinosis.

        I got the antelope from the local butcher.
        They had rattlesnake/elk sausage. Any thoughts on that? Never had snake.

        • It’s all I how you take care of the meat and if you cook it correctly… Just like pork can get worms so can bear meat… people just need to be diligent about preparation and make sure to cook it to the right temp… What I’ve found is with sausage and Jerky, you can make any meat edible lol… I’ve had Emu Jerky and it was legit… sausage and jerky always have a bunch of spices and fillers, not really straight up meat… that being said a real cut of steak from an antelope, deer, or elk is excellent… as long as the person prepared it adequately… anybody who says they don’t like venison or elk hasn’t eaten a correctly butchered and cured animal… it can be a gamey, nasty tasting meal otherwise

        • The reality of it is the potential is there. You just have to take care of the bear meat properly from harvest to your belly. A lot of wild animals that we eat have potential for worms/trichenosis/salmonella or Lord knows what. I always make sure my wild game is cooked all the way.

  41. Morning after. Tough weekend with the recruiting thing and losing a winnable game. I read the clownzano article for the first time in a long time. I did not realize we were last in the Pac 12 in football spending. Maybe something to it, otherwise everyone would be Boise state or Air Force.

    We are better than last year and the defense has improved from horrible to just bad. Our defensive backfield seems to be the worst aspect of the D.

    Smith inherited a mess and it will take some time to fix it. I hope smith is the guy that can do it. It would probably help to spend more $ on the program.

  42. Smith running Choke Air out for a 50 yard FG attempt is akin to a dumbass repeatedly burning his finger by touching a glowing hot piece of metal to check if it is still hot. That is a troubling lack of judgment by the leader of the program.

  43. On the blocked FG, does anyone know….did Choke kick it too low or was it poor blocking? Choke deserves blame when it’s warranted, but if blocks were missed that should be called out too. I have not seen a replay yet.

    Thanks, looks like we were asking at about the same time.

    • Stanford guy was unblocked….had a free run on the right side during the block. What kills me is you can tell there is not enough Beavs on that side of the line. Stanford had two against one on that side. Coaches should have recognized it and should have been a timeout.
      This game is squarely on the special teams. Beavs should have gone into half time with at least one score.

  44. A guy on Twitter said Choker is 0-8 from beyond 50 not 0-6 as being quoted here. Not sure who is right, but Smith looks even worse if it’s 0-8.

    • You may want to go with 0-8. I think the 0-6 came from a stat that was shown during the game. As you know, the P-12 Network is renowned for its detailed research.

    • On the radio broadcast, when Choker was trotted out for that 50-yard attempt (right before the half?), they mentioned watching him in warmups attempting 50 yarders and not having the distance….

      That was such a poor coaching choice.

  45. Not being mentioned much is we gave up 250 yards and and 3TDs to a backup QB in his first start.
    Made that guy look all world. I think if Costello played we’d have won…luck o’ da………

    • Saw the QBR stat for Stanford’s QB vs Luton head to head last night was 91 vs 71, in favor of Stanford’s guy.

      Stat gives different weights to different plays based on situation, expected outcome and actual outcome. It’s designed to not give too much credit for a guy throwing a 90 yard bomb as time expires in a blowout and penalizes players for losing yards in key situations(such as taking a sack to push your team out of field goal range)

      90 and up is considered “good”

      I think that means 71 is considered “not so good”

      • Stars matter. I want to find hope. Its not like I can bail and ever have a team I love like the Beavs. Thought D had some big plays which never happened last year. Still think Gebbia and a new kicker should have happened. I saw D moved Speights into first rotation. Riley Sharp can play. Secondary still bad. Some great plays off the under center.
        Ed Ray needs to be kicked the fuck out of the University. Special teams are poor again. We held Standford to many less then 2 yard runs which is new. Two missed sacks equated to 7 points and 4. Sloppy play.
        Ucla, az, asu, Cal , wsu games we should be in. Utah multi score loss, UW and Oregon done by 10min into the second quarter. Pierce is an absolute stud.

    • Smith sure deflected on the Williams question (like we knew he would). He understands the details, but can he get his players to execute enough to win close games. The hard follow up question that was not asked by the media is “why can’t they execute”?

      An interesting addendum…Hodgins is quoted in Oregon Live as saying the team had several “lethargic” practices last week.

  46. Who ever Jacob Hedberg is he sucks ;). Nice picks this week dude. I’m not sure he can be caught at this point. It’s a race for second place now.

    • I grew up around there. It’s a shit hole.
      And there is zero support for college football in NJ. Zero. If anyone does watch it they watch Penn State.

  47. In my view we would have won this game if we had used Gebbia. True, Luton is a good passer and played hard, and he had spurts of really good play, mostly in the second half. Having said that, there were several times that he had opportunities to run the ball for first downs, or even a touchdown or two (particularly when he missed our wide open receiver in the end zone with an open field in front of him). He is not able to sustain the level of play required for a full 60 minutes. Overall, he is a big liability to our future success.

    At this point there is no more question, we have to prepare for the rest of the season, and next year. Playing Jake is a waste of time. Clearly we won’t be going to a bowl. Who cares if we win one more game, of two or three. The season is most likely lost. We have a four star QB who set several California passing records, and a guy who has shown that he run if needed. What the hell are we waiting for. Get the kid in there and start giving him some experience.

    .

  48. Any highlights of Pierce’s run handy? I liked hearing him deliver (again) on his opportunities. I think the guy is going to make an NFL roster.

  49. This season was lost as soon as Luton got his 6th year form the NCAA. It put Smith in a bind to go with the senior(again) or his unproven 4* qb transfer. As a 2nd year coach with a lot of things to deal with, Smith hasn’t shown the capability of making that decision and going with the ‘kid’.

    I wish Gebbia had been named the starter from spring ball onward and given the team time to get used to the idea, and mentally prepare to rally behind the future qb. They’ve all seen the skill of Luton…I wonder if he is a qb version of Bolden- great practice player but unreliable in game pressure.

    Beavs should be 3-1 in spite of themselves and are sitting at 1-3. Luton is a limited qb and not a true leader with no “IT” factor at all. He is a blow-out stat stuffer who cannot win under duress.

    Give Gebbia 8 games and he wins 2-3 of them. Had they given him 12, I think he wins 6 . Luton may win 2 out of 12.

    It is of course a team game, but this has been seen for 3 years and he is not better than when he arrived.

    • I didn’t realize Luton played on special teams and leaped over the line of scrimmage and landed on a defender to draw a 15 yard penalty with 9:44 left in the 4th quarter?

      That play cost us the game. Luton actually did a good job in the second half on Saturday. We don’t get that penalty, we’d be down 24-14. We score the TD to answer, it’s now 24-21. We get them to go 3 and out, then score a TD on our next drive, we go up 24-28. This forces Stanford to have to get a touchdown, and not set up for a field goal. Since that didn’t happen, we used both our remaining timeouts when Stanford had none remaining. We go into cover 3 and only rush 3 down lineman to try to get a pass rush, we essentially play prevent zone. This also cost us the game. We can’t get shut out in a half and expect to win a game either. The beavs out gained, got more first downs, still haven’t turned the ball over via INT. I would say Luton is not the problem. It’s that this team cannot put a complete game together. Also, Luton got sacked 2 times in a row to push us out of manageable field goal range, so if anything, that would be the only series I could see Luton being an issue, but generally sacks are on the offensive line and RB’s for not picking up blitzes.

      The first half was far too predictable in play calling; as the announcers pointed out with the Pistol look being a hand off every single time. The screen game is effective because it’s not overused like it was with Riley’s offense.

      • Luton over threw a wide open kolby taylor in the end zone that ended in a miss from Choker. He as also held on to those sacks when he had time to throw them away, instead he goes backwards and loses 10+ yards. I’ll give him a small pass on that as Choker couldn’t hit that field goal anyway.

      • truth is, even in your scenario, Stanford wins 31-28 because they score a touchdown at the end rather than kicking a field goal. Starting at the 50 with 1:45 left to play, easily accomplished. After the scramble for the first down Stanford was trying to run the clock down for the FG. If they needed at TD they would have gotten it. Different plot line, same ending.

  50. Why didn’t anybody tell me Indiana has a starting QB with the last name “Penix”?

    Commentary during Indiana games must be fantastic.

    “Penix is all over the field today”
    “Penix is a dual threat”
    “Penix, hands-off”
    “Penix, under center”

  51. Has Jefferson played more than 4 games this year? He was out vs Cal Poly but I thought I saw him for a couple of snaps vs Stanford. If he’s going to be dinged up and ineffective for most of the season wouldn’t it make more sense to start thinking redshirt?

    Also, I think maybe Daschel from o-live is peeking over our shoulder. He’s got an article up questioning Luton and Choker. Not the usual golly gee what a great moral victory stuff.

    • Good point. No sense counting games if he is only getting in for a couple reps. And we have more than enough bodies at the RB position to cover for him. No sense in rushing him back from his injury just so he can re-aggravate it

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here