We’re at a super tricky part of the schedule. Back to back road games vs mid-tier programs in possibly hostile environments. Some altitude acclimation, etc. If the Beavs get through these games, we’re going to have an incredible ending to the season. Smith seemed slightly more conservative after watching Lanning’s blunders. I hope that continues. People think you have to be aggressive on the road, but I think you take points and stay close on the road. Force the crowd out of the game, make them all tense up, etc. This is better. Just take points until you don’t have a choice. That’s the best method.

36-24, Beavs

Goooo Beavs.

We can handle the Oregon/Washington commentary in this thread, too. That’s setup to be a classic.

I’m sticking with 27-24 Beavs.

Super interesting game. I was looking at some historical stats, and the Beavs are 17-43 lifetime vs UCLA but 8-14 at home. Still awful, but better. Only 17 wins ever vs UCLA. We also only have an average of 15 points scored. This of course is a different Beavs team with more talent than those, but to me it suggests the historical talent mismatch that’s likely still in place to some degree.

That said, I think the Beavs feed off the crowd and get it done. I want to see DJU running to get 1st downs and extend drives. That skill could be really useful in this game and a place for the Beavs to get some advantage.

My biggest concern is Smith, who’s game decisions are a full blown liability. Could cost us in this one if he continues to be reckless.

27-24 Beavs.

Gooo Beavs.

Note: Cal QB out. Changing the prediction to 34-17, Beavs.

This is a tricky game. Cal isn’t good, but they’re not bad, either. On the road, I think this one stays closer than it should be. I think DJU will be more efficient, Smith will blow an extra point, and it will lead to the Beavs winning but not covering.

27-21 Beavs.