It's becoming clear the Beavers season ended in Arizona with the injury to James Rodgers. Ironic, considering it was their biggest win of the year.

Who else noticed that Jacquizz started calling people out right around the time the team went in the latrine? He started during the Washington game, then took it to the media afterwards. It continued after loses to UCLA and Washington State.

When I saw Quizz getting on the offensive linemen (in the papers), my first thought was "that's the coaches job"…didn't think much about the discontent it might cause. In retrospect it seems like that's what happened. This team genuinely seems to dislike one another. Quizz clearly hates his offensive linemen, or at least their attitude, and he doesn't seem enamored with Ryan "Dirk Diggler" Katz, either. However, Rodgers did a disservice to the team by bringing it to the papers. Fans insulting the offensive line on a public blog is one thing, but when they're shamed by one of their peers it destroys confidence.

As far as Riley, I have a feeling we'll see a new man. His quotes this week have sure been out of character, sounding more like Rick Neuheisel pleading with fans:

“I am very appreciative of that,’’ said Riley, who also acknowledged the Dad’s Weekend crowd of 45,389 for WSU – a crowd eerily quiet for much of the afternoon because of the shocking turn of events on the field.

 “All I can do is assure them we will do everything we can to try and play the best football we can in the next three games,’’ said Riley, addressing the students.

Very strange quote. I'll leave it at that.

Read between the lines, though. The guy is clearly feeling the heat. Expect to see him redirect that pressure upon his staff to step up their recruiting, game planning, etc. Do not be surprised to see Riley takeover play calling. He did this before the 2008 season, and he's publicly questioned (a) Quizz getting too few carries and (b) the "rhythm" of the offense. The latter is coach speak for bad play calling. And Banker? He is under contract for just one more year, so anything can happen. Riley deserves a pass this season; the coordinators do not.

As far as USC, I don't know what to expect, nor do you. We know the Beavers will lose the eyeball test and be out-physicalled. That's about all we know. It's nice to guess right and feel smart and all, but we're beyond predictions or expectations. There's too much going on internally to gauge how the individual player (never mind the larger whole) will react to adversity. A team has a soul comprised of it's parts, and what makes that energy wax or wane are 100 different variables. How they come together this Saturday will be a matter of how the individuals handle themselves and contribute and believe in the unit. I wouldn't be surprised to see a big showing–they are definitely the more desperate team of the two–but I wouldn't be surprised to see Cody Vaz in the game and Mike Riley calling plays, either. Would you?

'morning, Beavlettes.

As is the weekly tradition, this is our gameday thread where ya'll get to complain, whine, cheer, and mock our beloved Beavs.

I'm just going to try to block out the disappointment of last week and enjoy the game with some good food and my lady Beav. I know the bowl situation looks dire, but I'm still hoping for the Alamo until it's no longer an option, and then I'll hope for the Holiday. What I am trying to say is this: as much as I/you want to root against the Beavs out of frustration and the hope that it will ignite (coaching) change, the reality is the roster improves next season and these coaches aren't going anywhere unless they have two or three bad seasons. So, here's a call for solidarity and a strong finish. A win today and some recruiting victories (Grant kids…*cough*) and we'll all be feeling better about the future.

Enjoy the game, and be glad we're not Auburn.

The Beavers, as a whole, have officially become unpredictable. It's ironic, since fans complain that their offensive and defensive units suffer the curse of predictability. The short of it goes like this: yes, everyone knows bomb on 1st down; Quizz dive left for 3 on 2nd, Quizz dive right for 2 on 3rd, then a punt; and every offense knows they'll see a base 4-3 with slow linebackers and one weak CB. But nobody has any F*$#*#ing idea what the outcome will be.

Counter intuitive stuff, right?

These eyes see the Beavers execute about the same (i.e. averagely) every game. So deduction leads me to believe that, in games with relatively equal talent, a win or loss is determined by how the opponent executes. If they do it well, the Beavers lose. Poorly, and the Beavs win.

Luckily Washington State suffers from poor execution and slightly less talent, so this game should be a win. A few months back, who would have thought we'd have to question it, though? In a season marked by polarizing opinions within the fan base, this is the one contest we unanimously penciled in the W column. It is supposed to be our shining moment of solidarity.

Do you still feel confident in victory?

I do, but instead of stat-padding-blowout, I see a modest two touchdown victory. And dare I say, I'm actually slightly nervous about…*gulp*…Washington State.

28-14, Beavs.