Home Blog Page 210

Why AngryBeavs is Important

22

I am listening to the This American Life Expose on the Federal Reserve this morning, and this part of the transcript hits home:

David Beim writes in his report that when it comes to hiring bank examiners, the Fed, quote, “should be willing to take chances on individuals with the confidence to speak their convictions, even at the risk of getting somewhat disruptive personalities.” says they should be like the kid who cries out that the emperor has no clothes.

He’s the only one who dares say it because he doesn’t have ordinary social instincts, he doesn’t act politely. And somebody like that has to–or a number of people like that–have to be employed by organizations that want to be able to catch a big systemic problem brewing. They’re willing to say what they think is right, even if people don’t like them as a result. They don’t care.

The bold reflecting my own philosophies and the reason I started AB. The mainstream media is a bunch of cock gobbling yes men (and women–I am looking at you, Mamma Machado). AB is disruptive. And yes, I don’t care if not a single person likes me. Any time I say what needs to be said it feels like taking a massive mental shit.

I recommend everyone tune into this American Life this morning as it’s an excellent episode.

Update on California’s “Yes means Yes”…

83

On September 2nd I wrote that this law was biased against male students, and it might result in athletes not attending California schools.

Well, it took only 13 days for Occidental College to take a law that hasn’t even been passed yet even further and make it even more Draconian, suggesting that Yes means No. Read the article here.

If you’re an 18 year old athlete, are you going to college in California? Expect USC, Oregon, and Arizona schools to get a recruiting windfall. Cue Jack to argue this incident isn’t biased against males.

Basking in Reflective Glory

118

As many of you know, I have been trying to figure out why I feel so disgusting when watching sports as opposed to playing them. While researching this I came across this article entitled “Basking in Reflective Glory” (Duck fans) written in 1976 and another called “The Psychology of Sports Fans” which describes how they “Cut off Reflective Failure” (Beaver fans).

Both phenomena are equally pathetic. On Twitter, I see Duck fans acting belligerent and proud, as if they themselves are ranked #2, played in the Rose Bowl, they’re shooting for the Heisman, etc. In reality all they have done is sit on a couch and chosen to associate themselves with other people who are out there doing those things. If you remember in the past, I wrote that using words like “we” when describing the Beavers felt wrong. I made a push to write “they”. Well the second article mentions this:

In contrast, “CORFing” means that you “Cut Off Reflected Failure.” Your team was trounced and now you want to distance yourself from them and their disgrace as much as possible. It’s not “we,” who lost, it’s “they.” The last thing a CORFer wants to wear on the day following the team’s loss are hats or shirts with the team’s logo. This is the test of the true vs. fickle fan. It’s the CORFers who are the fickle fans. Their identification with them rises and falls with the box scores. True fans, in contrast, will don jerseys, hats, and almost any item with the team logo no matter how poorly their team performs. True fans may feel dejected, but their heroes remain their heroes, even if somewhat tarnished by defeat.

This also explains why many of us on AB hate the old guard. They are the “true fans” who stick with a group of “heroes”, while we are the “fickle fans” who want to distance from the disgrace. I’d rather be the latter because it’s only approving of and rewarding a high standard. I’d say we are not so much fickle as we have high standards for all things in life. Do you find that true in your day to day life? I do.

Anyway, I was happy to finally understand why I feel disgusting watching sports: it is because I’m not out there doing.  On Saturday my girlfriend and I cycled to a local field and threw the football around (she can sling it about 15 yards!). Not a single person watched us, there was no glory, yet it was more rewarding than coming home to watch the Beavers beat SDSU.

The links are posted above, and I suggest everyone read both articles. The one written in 1976 is especially fascinating and excellent. This morning I made fun of some Ducks on Twitter for basking in reflective glory. I am hoping this catches on because it’s really the best insult as it highlights how pathetic this all is.

USC Week

65

People want a new thread, but I don’t have time right now so I will keep it short.

The Beavs played their most complete game of the year on Saturday, and based on what I have seen of USC (2 quarters), the Beavs should have at least be competitive on Saturday. If the Beavs were home I’d be thinking upset. On the road probably not. But big picture here is that USC isn’t that great. The big problem is that OSU’s front four likely won’t get any pressure on Kessler and he’ll pick on the secondary. Other than that, the matchup is pretty even. I’d like to see the Beavs blitz LBs for a change, especially on obvious passing downs. They’ll have to take calculated gambles like that to get pressure.

On offense, I think there will be some jitters for the young guys (conference play, ESPN, road game, etc) and expect a bad first quarter. After that it should get better. Beavs don’t have any clear advantages on offense so they’ll need to execute at a high level to stay in the game. The -12 line seems a bit high to me. I’d say -7 or -10 would be more in line with reality, but we’ll see.

It was nice to see Hunter Jarmon come up big. I had him targeted as the guy who needed to replace Cooks, and also had him as a 5-star prospect and 2nd best in the 2013 class. I heard Xavier Hawkins was activated to replace Bolden. That is a big downgrade as far as I’m concerned. I had Hawkins as a 2-star. Many people in TN (and Beaver fans) raved about him, so we’ll see on Saturday. I’d be thrilled to be wrong, but he looked like Malcolm Marable part II to me.

I’m thinking something like 27-20 USC but would not be surprised if the Beavs are in this game in the 4th quarter. This is more about USC being slightly overrated and having more pressure/more to lose than thinking the Beavs are a top 20 team. The Beavs right now are an average team (top 40) that is executing at a fairly low level (but improving week to week). I do like how each opponent the Beavs have played has been progressively better. That’ll help, though USC is quite a jump from SDSU. Mannion better protect the ball.

San Diego State @ Oregon State

281

Game time is 7:30pm PST on Fox Sports 1.

Go Beavs.